The invalidExtensions flag no longer seems necessary. Tests pass without it.
Change-Id: Ieb35e26912b047718ccbfcdc926625aec1cd8c87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185937
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The proper semantics for a message field within a oneof
when unmarshaling is to merge into an existing message,
rather than replacing it.
Change-Id: I7c08f6e4fa958c6ee6241e9083f7311515a97e15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185957
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Make the fast-path and slow-path versions of IsInitialized report
exactly the same errors: An errors.RequiredNotSet containing the
full name of one of the unset required fields.
Bugfix: Fast-path IsInitialized on a nil message reports an error only
when the message directly contains required fields.
Bugfix: Include fast-path IsInitialized in legacy messageIfaceWrapper.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#887
Change-Id: Ia5e4b386f8c23f6f855d995f4a098b1338acbae3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185397
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Don't fail on test cases with partial messages.
Create a new message on each decode cycle.
Change-Id: I7c1d91a2853e340fc0bae05a238bb28eb682e6ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185377
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This does not remove all dependencies,
but all of the cases where it can now be implemented in terms of v2.
Change-Id: Idc5b0273f0d35c284bf2141eb9cce998692ceb15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/184878
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Len looks like it should be O(1), but the need to check for
non-zero-length repeated fields makes it at minimum O(n) where n is
the number of repeated fields. In practice, it's O(n) where n is the
number of fields altogether.
The Len function is not especially useful, easily duplicated with Range
and a counter, and can be surprisingly inefficient. Drop it.
Change-Id: I24b27433217e131e842bd18dd58475bcdf62ef97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183678
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Move the benchmarks using the common protobuf datasets out of proto/ and
into their own directory. Add benchmarks for text and JSON.
Move initialization out of the Benchmark function to avoid including it
in CPU/memory profiles.
We could put benchmarks in each individual package (proto, prototext,
etc.), but the need for common infrastructure around managing the test
data makes it simpler to keep the benchmarks together. Also, it's nice
to have a one-stop overview of performance.
Change-Id: I17c37efb91b2413fc43ab1b4c35bff2e1330bc0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183245
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This currently returns uninformative errors from the fast path and then
consults the slow, reflection-based path only when an error is detected.
Perhaps it's worth going through the effort of producing better errors
directly on the fast path.
Change-Id: I68536e9438010dbd97dbaff4f47b78430221d94b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171462
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Immediately abort (un)marshal operations when encountering invalid UTF-8
data in proto3 strings. No other proto implementation supports non-UTF-8
data in proto3 strings (and many reject it in proto2 strings as well).
Producing invalid output is an interoperability threat (other
implementations won't be able to read it).
The case where existing string data is found to contain non-UTF8 data is
better handled by changing the field to the `bytes` type, which (aside
from UTF-8 validation) is wire-compatible with `string`.
Remove the errors.NonFatal type, since there are no remaining cases
where it is needed. "Non-fatal" errors which produce results and a
non-nil error are problematic because they compose poorly; the better
approach is to take an option like AllowPartial indicating which
conditions to check for.
Change-Id: I9d189ec6ffda7b5d96d094aa1b290af2e3f23736
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183098
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The primary (cross-language) protobuf repository contains benchmark data
sets. Add benchmarks using this data. (A version of this benchmark exists
in the protobuf repository, but it uses the v1 API and isn't trivial to
get working.)
Fetch the small benchmark datasets from the
github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf repo by default. Add a
download_benchdata.bash script which fetches the larger datasets as
well.
Generate necessary packages under internal/testprotos/benchmarks.
To run:
go run ./proto -bench=BenchmarkData
Usual caveats about benchmarking apply: While these benchmarks use
realistic data, isolated microbenchmarking of proto operations is not
necessarily representitive of performance in production systems.
Change-Id: I58d107554baf104568c86997b5ad50be8b2a5790
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183297
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Fix a bug where using Message.Range alone does not clear
memory references for empty, but allocated lists and maps.
Thus, we iterate over every known field and explicitly call Clear.
Change-Id: I9c1847d4056cf66f3199947150f3140d0783444a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183197
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Added API:
Message.Len
Message.Range
Message.Has
Message.Clear
Message.Get
Message.Set
Message.Mutable
Message.NewMessage
Message.WhichOneof
Message.GetUnknown
Message.SetUnknown
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
Message.KnownFields
Message.UnknownFields
The primary difference with the new API is that the top-level
Message methods are keyed by FieldDescriptor rather than FieldNumber
with the following semantics:
* For known fields, the FieldDescriptor must exactly match the
field descriptor known by the message.
* For extension fields, the FieldDescriptor must implement ExtensionType,
where ContainingMessage.FullName matches the message name, and
the field number is within the message's extension range.
When setting an extension field, it automatically stores
the extension type information.
* Extension fields are always considered nullable,
implying that repeated extension fields are nullable.
That is, you can distinguish between a unpopulated list and an empty list.
* Message.Get always returns a valid Value even if unpopulated.
The behavior is already well-defined for scalars, but for unpopulated
composite types, it now returns an empty read-only version of it.
Change-Id: Ia120630b4db221aeaaf743d0f64160e1a61a0f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175458
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Instead of accepting a concrete protoregistry.Types type,
accept an interface that provides the necessary functionality
to perform the serialization.
The advantages of this approach:
* There is no need for complex logic to allow a Parent or custom
Resolver on the protoregistry.Types type.
* Users can pass their own custom resolver implementations directly
to the serialization functions.
* This is a more principled approach to plumbing custom resolvers
than the previous approach of overloading behavior on the concrete
Types type.
The disadvantages of this approach:
* A pointer to a concrete type is 8B, while an interface is 16B.
However, the expansion of the {Marshal,Unmarshal}Options structs
should be a concern solved separately from how to plumb custom resolvers.
* The resolver interfaces as defined today may be insufficient to
provide functionality needed in the future if protobuf expands its
feature set. For example, let's suppose the Any message permits
directly representing a enum by name. This would require the ability
to lookup an enum by name. To support that hypothetical need,
we can document that the serializers type-assert the provided Resolver
to a EnumTypeResolver and use that if possible. There is some loss
of type safety with this approach, but provides a clear path forward.
Change-Id: I81ca80e59335d36be6b43d57ec8e17abfdfa3bad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177044
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Rename encoding/*pb to follow the convention of prefixing package names
with 'proto':
google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protojson
google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/prototext
Move protogen under a compiler/ directory, just in case we ever do add
more compiler-related packages.
google.golang.org/protobuf/compiler/protogen
Change-Id: I31010cb5cabcea8274fffcac468477b58b56e8eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177178
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Temporarily remove go.mod, since we can't generate an accurate one until
the corresponding v1 change is submitted.
Change-Id: I1e1ad97f2b455e33f61ffaeb8676289795e47e72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177000
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Added API:
FieldDescriptor.IsExtension
FieldDescriptor.IsList
FieldDescriptor.MapKey
FieldDescriptor.MapValue
FieldDescriptor.ContainingOneof
FieldDescriptor.ContainingMessage
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
FieldDescriptor.Oneof
FieldDescriptor.Extendee
These methods help cleanup several common usage patterns.
Change-Id: I9a3ffabc2edb2173c536509b22f330f98bba7cf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/176977
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Added methods:
Enum.Descriptor
Message.Descriptor
EnumType.Descriptor
MessageType.Descriptor
ExtensionType.Descriptor
Message.New
All functionality is switched over to use those methods instead of
implicitly relying on the fact that {Enum,Message}Type implicitly
implement the associated descriptor interface.
This CL does not yet remove {Enum,Message}.Type or prevent
{Enum,Message,Extension}Type from implementating a descriptor.
That is a subsequent CL.
The Message.New method is also added to replace functionality
that will be lost when the Type methods are removed.
Change-Id: I7fefde1673bbd40bfdac489aca05cec9a6c98eb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/174918
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
CL/172399 switches the v1 code to eagerly unmarshal extensions.
This CL does the equivalent for v2.
For the test, we simply switch from protoV1.Equal to protoV2.Equal,
since the v2 equal does not magically unmarshal raw extensions.
Change-Id: I6f64455b0a75bbc9a9a82108558641a29bd2b982
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175838
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Add support for basic equality comparison of messages.
Messages are equal if they have the same type and marshal to the
same bytes with deterministic serialization, with some exceptions:
- Messages with different registered extensions are unequal.
- NaN is not equal to itself.
Unlike the v1 Equal, a nil message is equal to an empty message of
the same type.
Change-Id: Ibabdadd8c767b801051b8241aeae1ba077e58121
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/174277
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The protobuf type system uses the word "descriptor" instead of "type".
We should avoid the "type" verbage when we aren't talking about Go types.
The old names are temporarily kept around for compatibility reasons.
Change-Id: Icc99c913528ead011f7a74aa8399d9c5ec6dc56e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/172238
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run the encode/decode tests as benchmarks. These are trivial microbenchmarks
and not representative of real-world usage, but serve as a useful overview
of the relative cost of various operations and are handy for profiling
specific narrow scenarios.
When run with the -v1 flag, benchmark the v1 implementation for comparison.
Change-Id: I469dd6759bef50e2bd039327095f82d29d70b8fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171120
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Using an option instead of a separate method has several useful properties:
It makes it explicit whether the fast-path AppendMarshal is expected to use
cached sizes or not.
It properly plumbs the decision to use cached sizes through the call stack.
Consider the case where message A includes B includes C: If A and C support
cached sizes but B does not, we would like to use the size cache in all
messages which support it. Placing this decision in the options allows this
to work properly with no additional effort.
Placing this option in MarshalOptions permits users to request use of
existing cached sizes. This is a two-edged sword: There are places where
this ability can permit substantial efficiencies, but this is also an
exceedingly sharp-edged API. I believe that on balance the benefits
outweigh the risks, especially since the prerequisites for using
cached sizes are intuitively obvious. (You must have called Size, and
you must not have changed the message.)
This CL adds a Size method to MarshalOptions, rather than adding a SizeOptions
type. Future additions to MarshalOptions may affect the size of the encoded
output (e.g., an option to skip encoding unknown fields) and using the same
options for both Marshal and Size makes it easier to use a consistent
configuration for each.
Change-Id: I6adbb55b717dd03d39f067e1d0b7381945000976
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171119
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Was overwriting the output buffer rather than appending to it.
Change-Id: I6ffb72a440f464f4259cfebc42c1dc75b73fb5ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171117
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Remove the Reflection field from MarshalOptions and UnmarshalOptions.
Disable the fast path and use the reflection-based implementation when
the 'protoreflect' build tag is set.
Change-Id: Ic674e3af67501de27fb03ec2712fbed40eae7fef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170896
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Move all checks for required fields into a proto.IsInitialized function.
Initial testing makes me confident that we can provide a fast-path
implementation of IsInitialized which will perform more than
acceptably. (In the degenerate-but-common case where a message
transitively contains no required fields, this check can be nearly
zero cost.)
Unifying checks into a single function provides consistent behavior
between the wire, text, and json codecs.
Performing the check after decoding eliminates the wire decoder bug
where a split message is incorrectly seen as missing required fields.
Performing the check after decoding also provides consistent and
arguably more correct behavior when the target message was partially
prepopulated.
Change-Id: I9478b7bebb263af00c0d9f66a1f26e31ff553522
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170787
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Allow message implementations to provide optimized versions of standard
operations. Generated messages now include a ProtoReflectMethods method,
returning a protoiface.Methods struct containing pointers to assorted
optional functions.
The Methods struct also includes a Flags field indicating support for
optional features such as deterministic marshaling.
Implementation of the fast paths (and tests) will come in later CLs.
Change-Id: Idd1beed0ecf43ec5e5e7b8da2ee1e08d3ce32213
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170340
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Create a single binary for handling generation of protos.
This replaces previous logic spread throughout the repo in:
* regenerate.bash
* cmd/protoc-gen-go/golden_test.go
* cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc/golden_test.go
* (indirectly) internal/protogen/goldentest
One of the problems with the former approaches is that they relied on
a version of protoc that was specific to a developer's workstation.
This meant that the result of generation was not hermetic.
To address this, we rely on the hard-coded version of protobuf specified
in the test.bash script.
A summary of changes in this CL are:
* The internal_gengo.GenerateFile and internal_gengogrpc.GenerateFile
functions are unified to have consistent signatures. It seems that the
former accepted a *protogen.GeneratedFile to support v1 where gRPC code
was generated into the same file as the base .pb.go file. However, the
same functionality can be achieved by having the function return
the generated file object.
* The test.bash script patches the protobuf toolchain to have properly
specified go_package options in each proto source file.
* The test.bash script accepts a "-regenerate" argument.
* Add generation for the well-known types. Contrary to how these were
laid out in the v1 repo, all the well-known types are placed in the
same Go package.
* Add generation for the conformance proto.
* Remove regenerate.bash
* Remove internal/protogen
* Remove cmd/protoc-gen-go/golden_test.go
* Remove cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc/golden_test.go
* Add cmd/protoc-gen-go/annotation_test.go
Change-Id: I4a1a97ae6f66e2fabcf4e4d292c95ab2a2db0248
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/164477
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Most usages of New actually prefer to interact with the reflective view
rather than the native Go type. Thus, change New to return that instead.
This parallels reflect.New, which returns the reflective view
(i.e., reflect.Value) instead of native type (i.e., interface{}).
We make the equivalent change to KnownFields.NewMessage, List.NewMessage,
and Map.NewMessage for consistency.
Since this is a subtle change where the type system will not always
catch the changed type, this change was made by both changing the type
and renaming the function to NewXXX and manually looking at every usage
of the the function to ensure that the usage correctly operates
on either the native Go type or the reflective view of the type.
After the entire codebase was cleaned up, a rename was performed to convert
NewXXX back to New.
Change-Id: I153fef627b4bf0a427e4039ce0aaec52e20c7950
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/157077
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
If a field has an ExtensionType defined, use it in decoding.
Change-Id: I85f3da0f52a11578500cf28e4611fa4eb31f0623
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154581
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The v2 decoder isn't 100% complete, but it's good enough.
Delete the vendored copy of the v1 Unmarshal implementation.
Change-Id: Ibeabbb2e9109a1ec3df57e71f98b7aa4a583fc5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154577
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Add proto.Unmarshal.
Test cases all produce identical results to the v1 unmarshaller.
Change-Id: I42259266018a14e88a650c5d83a043cb17a3a15d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153918
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This initial implementation covers marshaling Message without use
of extensions, Any expansion, weak yet.
Change-Id: Ic787939c1d2a4e70e40c3a1654c6e7073052b7d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151677
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
