Specifically:
* Move the creation of the pointer to the copied buffer into the
DECLARE() macro, to solve warnings about potentially skipping
initialization.
* Reorder the arguments of the FREE() macro - having a different order
made it confusing, so keep the order the same throughout.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
* Separate initialization from allocation.
* Rewrite description of macros to fit the new interface.
* Use a longer name to store the local copy objects, to reduce the risk
of shadowing.
* Use different names for the original and the copy. Append the suffix
'_external' to the original argument and use the previous name
for the copy.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Previously the return from psa_crypto_local_output_free() had a fixed
name, which meant that multiple outputs would cause redefinitions of the
same variable.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
* Set swapped pointers to NULL when the buffers are freed.
* Change example name <buffer> to <input> and <output> to reduce
confusion.
* Document assumptions of FREE_LOCAL_ macros.
* Add comment on error case in FREE_LOCAL_OUTPUT(), explaining why it's
okay to mask the existing status code.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
This allows us to entirely remove copying code, where the convenience
macros are used for copying.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Since we are applying hooks transparently to all tests, we cannot setup
and teardown test hooks in the tests. Instead we must do this in the
test wrappers which are used to pre-poison and unpoison memory.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
This helps to prevent confusion as it avoids overloading the word
"copy" as both an action and an object.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
This helps to prevent confusion as it avoids overloading the word
"copy" as both an action and an object.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
When we are copying output, it makes sense to return
PSA_ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL since the buffer we are copying to is a user
output buffer.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Change psa_crypto_output_copy_free() to use psa_crypto_copy_output()
rather than calling memcpy directly as was erroneously done previously.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
This tied input and output buffers together in
awkward pairs, which made the API more difficult
to use.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Since we are internal rather than user-facing,
PSA_ERROR_CORRUPTION_DETECTED makes more sense than
PSA_ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL. Whilst it really is a buffer that is too
small, this error code is intended to indicate that a user-supplied
buffer is too small, not an internal one.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Zero-length buffers should be represented in the
psa_crypto_buffer_copy_t struct as NULL if it was created in
psa_crypto_alloc_and_copy(), so reject non-NULL zero-length buffers.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
If we have a copy buffer but no original to copy back to, there is not
much sensible we can do. The psa_crypto_buffer_copy_t state is invalid.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Since it is implementation-dependent whether
malloc(0) returns NULL or a pointer, explicitly
represent zero-length buffers as NULL in the
buffer-copy struct, so as to have a uniform
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
