What matters is that we validate that test data is not removed. Keeping the
test data is the most obvious way, but not the only way.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The import-and-save and load-and-check parts of the tests don't have to be
actually the same test cases.
Introduce the terms “forward compatibility” and “backward compatibility” and
relate them to import-and-save and load-and-check actions.
These are clarifications of intent that do not represent an intended change
in the strategy or intended coverage.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Previously the check was convoluted. This has been simplified
and given a more appropriate suggestion as per gilles suggestion
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
* Add tests to validate MSB not ok for Curve25519 and
Curve448.
* Add a test to generate key for for Curve448.
Signed-off-by: Archana <archana.madhavan@silabs.com>
Enable Curve448 support
Add test vectors to evaluate
* RFC 7748
* a known-answer public key export test.
* a known-answer ECDH (X448) test.
Signed-off-by: Archana <archana.madhavan@silabs.com>
mbedtls_ecp_read_key and mbedtls_ecp_write_key are updated to include
support for Curve448 as prescribed by RFC 7748 §5.
Test suites have been updated to validate curve448 under Montgomery
curves.
Signed-off-by: Archana <archana.madhavan@silabs.com>
add space between bracket and a newline that had occured
through changes but do not match the original file style
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
The power 2 check now uses a looping bit shift to try match
with the block sizes and will escape the loop when appropriate
The test cases, as pointed out by Gilles, could be harmful in
the future and testing a test case is not generally necessary
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Remove a check in rsa_rsassa_pkcs1_v15_encode() that
is not needed because the same check is performed
earlier. This check was added in #4707.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
Restore the optimization done in
HEAD^{/Speed up the generation of storage format test cases}
which was lost during refactoring made when adding support for
implicit usage flags.
There are still more than one call to the C compiler, but the extra
calls are only for some key usage test cases.
This is an internal refactoring. This commit does not change the
output of generate_psa_tests.py
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
tests/scripts/check_test_cases.py located duplicate descriptions
for the negative tests checking that the check fails when a block
size is not a power of 2
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
We previously introduced a safety check ensuring that if a datagram had
already been dropped twice, it would no longer be dropped or delayed
after that.
This missed an edge case: if a datagram is dropped once, it can be
delayed any number of times. Since "delay" is not defined in terms of
time (x seconds) but in terms of ordering with respect to other messages
(will be forwarded after the next message is forwarded), depending on
the RNG results this could result in an endless loop where all messages
are delayed until the next, which is itself delayed, etc. and no message
is ever forwarded.
The probability of this happening n times in a row is (1/d)^n, where d
is the value passed as delay=d, so for delay=5 and n=5 it's around 0.03%
which seems small but we still happened on such an occurrence in real
life:
tests/ssl-opt.sh --seed 1625061502 -f 'DTLS proxy: 3d, min handshake, resumption$'
results (according to debug statements added for the investigation) in
the ClientHello of the second handshake being dropped once then delayed
5 times, after which the client stops re-trying and the test fails for
no interesting reason.
Make sure this doesn't happen again by putting a cap on the number of
times we fail to forward a given datagram immediately.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Add a check to ensure the block_size is or is not a power of 2
Add a new parameter to verify the expected pass/fail when a block_size
is or is not a power of 2.
Add new sets of input data to verify these tests
Fixes#4228
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
