Document the type mapping and the recommended pattern for working with
extensions. This documentation was Google-internal (cl/335451491), presumably
because of the reference to static analysis tools that don’t exist outside.
Compared to the internal version, this CL uses “should” instead of “must”.
Change-Id: I9293c10b2f6f91c9546d145c94b52e84f3a7a9c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/607995
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Höppner <hoeppi@google.com>
Modernize the documentation across the entire module
to make use of the newer ability to linkify declarations.
Change-Id: I440f9a3f025ec6fadfd9cba59b1dfb57028bf3f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/309430
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Changes made:
* Ensure protoreflect.ExtensionType.IsValidInterface never panics,
especially if given a nil interface value.
* Have protoreflect.ExtensionType.IsValid{Interface,Value} only
perform type-checks. It does not do value checks (i.e., whether the
value itself is valid). Value validity is left to when an actual
protoreflect.Message.Set operation is performed.
* Add special-casing on proto.SetExtension to treat an invalid
message or list as functionally equivalent to Clear. This is to
be more consistent with the legacy SetExtension implementation
which never panicked when given such values.
* Add special-casing on proto.HasExtension to treat a mismatched
extension descriptor as simply not being present in the message.
This is also to be more consistent with the legacy HasExtension
implementation which did the same thing.
Change-Id: Idf0419abf27b9f85d9b92bd2ff8088e25b7990cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/229558
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Two changes:
* Add RangeExtensions as a more suitable replacement for legacy
proto.ClearExtensions and proto.ExtensionDescs functions.
* Make HasExtension and GetExtension treat nil message interface
as an empty message to more consistently match legacy behavior.
Change-Id: I8eb1887a33d0737f2f80a2b80358cc296087ba3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/229157
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Remove a stray bit of punctuation that crept into one of the license
headers and got copied around everywhere.
Change-Id: Iebe4e882650ab6dab28f132b5e324e2ab0b99a73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220339
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Descriptor methods generally return a Descriptor with no Go type
information. ExtensionType's Descriptor is an exception, returning an
ExtensionTypeDescriptor containing both the proto descriptor and a
reference back to the ExtensionType. The pure descriptor is accessed
by xt.Descriptor().Descriptor().
Rename ExtensionType's Descriptor method to TypeDescriptor to make it
clear that it behaves a bit differently.
Change 1/2: Add the TypeDescriptor method and deprecate Descriptor.
Change-Id: I1806095044d35a474d60f94d2a28bdf528f12238
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/192139
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Change protoiface.ExtensionDescV1 to implement protoreflect.ExtensionType.
ExtensionDescV1's Name field conflicts with the Descriptor Name method,
so change the protoreflect.{Message,Enum,Extension}Type types to no
longer implement the corresponding Descriptor interface. This also leads
to a clearer distinction between the two types.
Introduce a protoreflect.ExtensionTypeDescriptor type which bridges
between ExtensionType and ExtensionDescriptor.
Add extension accessor functions to the proto package:
proto.{Has,Clear,Get,Set}Extension. These functions take a
protoreflect.ExtensionType parameter, which allows writing the
same function call using either the old or new API:
proto.GetExtension(message, somepb.E_ExtensionFoo)
Fixesgolang/protobuf#908
Change-Id: Ibc65d12a46666297849114fd3aefbc4a597d9f08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/189199
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
