Use protobuild to generate test messages, both to simplify generating
proto2/proto3/extension variants of each test where appropriate and
to make it easier to test alternative message generators in the future.
Add various additional merge tests.
Change-Id: I4ba3ce232304e1d8325543680e2b6aae61de7364
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/219146
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
We're still debating what the semantics of shallow merges should be, and
what the use case for them (if any) is. There's no need to commit
ourselves to this feature at this time; drop it for now.
Remove the exported MergeOptions type, since the only option is gone. We
can trivially add it back in the future if we need it.
Change-Id: I4c8697cae69cc66eed1ea65de84b982f20e1be44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/219145
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
The generated Go code does not perfectly represent the protobuf data model.
As such, it is possible to construct Go message values that could not
otherwise be constructed through Unmarshal or Merge.
This CL adds a test to exercise some of the boundary conditions.
The tests do not necessarily lock in the current behavior, but provides
a way for us to know when they have changed (either intentionally or not).
Change-Id: I389ef97c2fcf037595ad553baf5270d7bee9673b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/196738
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TODOs that we do not intend to address have been deleted.
Those that are blocking v2 release are marked with "blocks".
Change-Id: I7efa9e546d0637b562101d0edc7009893d762722
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/218878
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Add a sentinel proto.Error error which matches all errors returned by
packages in this module.
Document that protoregistry.NotFound is an exact sentinel value for
performance reasons.
Add a Wrap function to the internal/errors package and use it to wrap
errors from outside sources (resolvers). Wrapped errors match
proto.Error.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#1021.
Change-Id: I45567df3fd6c8dc9a5caafdb55654827f6fb1941
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215338
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add a test to confirm that extensions are lazily decoded when we expect.
Drop the UnmarshalDefaultResolver flag. I added it thinking for some
reason that internal/impl couldn't depend on protoregistry; since it can
(and does), it's simpler to just test if the resolver is the expected
value.
Use a default set of options when lazily unmarshaling extensions.
Change-Id: Ied7666ffdc3bf90630260a80c9568d9a945048bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/218038
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Return the size of the field read from the validator, permitting us to
avoid an extra parse when skipping over groups.
Return an UnmarshalOutput from the validator, since it already combines
two of the validator outputs: bytes read and initialization status.
Remove initialization status from the ValidationStatus enum, since it's
covered by the UnmarshalOutput.
Change-Id: I3e684c45d15aa1992d8dc3bde0f608880d34a94b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/217763
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Tweak the "nested unknown extension" test case's resolver to not depend
on the exact message being tested. Useful for if/when we want to run
these tests on other message implementations.
Change-Id: Id1722afd8e094ddb59cb3e5440f7994c20cfa681
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/217760
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
The proto package tests often test several variations of messages with a
similar shape. For example, most tests are performed with a proto2
message with a regular field, a proto2 message with an extension field,
and a proto3 message.
Add a protobuild package which can initialize all these variations from
a single template. For example, these three messages:
&testpb.TestAllTypes{OptionalInt32: proto.Int32(1)}
&test3pb.TestAllTypes{OptionalInt32: 1}
m := &testpb.TestAllExtensions{}
proto.SetExtension(m, &testpb.E_OptionalInt32, 1)
can all be constructed from the template:
protobuild.Message{"optional_int32": 1}
This reduces redundancy in tests and will make it more practical to
test alternative code generators.
Change-Id: I3245a4bf74ee1bce957bc772fed513d427720677
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/217457
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The Format function and MarshalOptions.Format method are helper
functions for directly obtaining the formatted string for a message
without having to deal with errors or convert a []byte to string.
It is only intended for human consumption (e.g., debugging or logging).
We also add a MarshalOptions.Multiline option to specify that the output
should use some default indentation in a multiline output.
This assists in the v1 to v2 migration where:
protoV1.CompactTextString(m) => prototext.MarshalOptions{}.Format(m)
protoV1.MarshalTextString(m) => prototext.Format(m)
At Google, there are approximately 10x more usages of MarshalTextString than
CompactTextString, so it makes sense that the top-level Format function
does multiline expansion by default.
Fixes#850
Change-Id: I149c9e190a6d99b985d3884df675499a3313e9b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213460
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Unknown extensions are initialized.
Valid extensions with no isInit func are initialized.
Change-Id: I2975c7ef85d2b777eca467d3b1861d20de8e24fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216960
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
After taking the lock on a lazy extension's state, check to see if it
was initialized while we were waiting for the lock.
Change-Id: I1cbd52e9d655eec6c9142c97689ae36f219a28f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216898
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Lost the check for the fast-path's Initialized output somewhere. Put it
back in.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Required/Wire/Unmarshal-12 37.8ns ± 1% 30.5ns ± 1% -19.36% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
Change-Id: Ica733366d00efba41023339a2bbd68167ab0df53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216897
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Historically, extensions have been placed in the unknown fields section
of the unmarshaled message and decoded lazily on demand. The current
unmarshal implementation decodes extensions eagerly at unmarshal time,
permitting errors to be immediately reported and correctly detecting
unset required fields in extension values.
Add support for validated lazy extension decoding, where the extension
value is fully validated at initial unmarshal time but the fully
unmarshaled message is only created lazily.
Make this behavior conditional on the protolegacy flag for now.
Change-Id: I9d742496a4bd4dafea83fca8619cd6e8d7e65bc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216764
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Change the representation of option flags in protoiface from bools to a
bitfield. This brings the representation of options in protoiface in
sync with that in internal/impl.
This change has several benefits:
1. We will probably find that we need to add more option flags over time.
Converting to the more efficient representation of these flags as high
in the call stack as possible minimizes the performance implication of
the struct growing.
2. On a similar note, this avoids the need to convert from the compact
representation to the larger one when passing from internal/impl to
proto, since the {Marshal,Unmarshal}State methods take the compact form.
3. This removes unused options from protoiface. Instead of documenting
that AllowPartial is always set, we can just not include an AllowPartial
flag in the protoiface options.
4. Conversely, this provides a way to add option flags to protoiface
that we don't want to expose in the proto package.
name old time/op new time/op delta
EmptyMessage/Wire/Marshal-12 11.1ns ± 7% 10.1ns ± 1% -9.35% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
EmptyMessage/Wire/Unmarshal-12 7.07ns ± 0% 6.74ns ± 1% -4.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
EmptyMessage/Wire/Validate-12 4.30ns ± 1% 3.80ns ± 8% -11.45% (p=0.000 n=7+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Marshal-12 1.17µs ± 1% 1.21µs ± 7% +4.09% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Unmarshal-12 938ns ± 0% 942ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.178 n=7+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Validate-12 521ns ± 4% 543ns ± 7% ~ (p=0.157 n=7+8)
Required/Wire/Marshal-12 97.2ns ± 1% 95.3ns ± 1% -1.98% (p=0.001 n=7+7)
Required/Wire/Unmarshal-12 41.0ns ± 9% 38.6ns ± 3% -5.73% (p=0.048 n=8+8)
Required/Wire/Validate-12 25.4ns ±11% 21.4ns ± 3% -15.62% (p=0.000 n=8+7)
Change-Id: I3ac1b00ab36cfdf61316ec087a5dd20d9248e4f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216760
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Tweak the test message to allow creating messages with extensions that
contain extensions that contain extensions, etc.
Change-Id: I41844ae699c88ab96bf0d30db3a3fbaf09616161
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216761
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown was simply not working. Oops. Fix it.
Add a test.
Change-Id: I76888eae1221d99a007f0e9cdb711d292e6856b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216762
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Recognize messagesets in the validator. Currently, this just gives
up and reports an unknown validity rather than trying to descend
into the messageset.
Plumb fast-path initialization checks through messageset decoding.
Change-Id: Ice55f28e8555764e4ce2720251830e8cf475c133
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216245
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add a fast check for required fields to the fast path unmarshal.
This is best-effort and will fail to detect some initialized
messages: Messages with more than 64 required fields, messages
split across multiple tags, possibly other cases.
In the cases where it works (which is most of them in practice),
this permits us to skip the IsInitialized check.
Change-Id: I6b70953a333033a5e64fb7ca37a59786cb0f75a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215878
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add functions to the proto package which plumb through the fast-path state.
As a sample use case: A followup CL adds an Initialized field to
protoiface.UnmarshalOutput, permitting the unmarshaller to report back
when it can confirm that a message is fully initialized. We want to
preserve that information when an unmarshal operation threads through
the proto package (such as when unmarshaling extensions).
To allow these functions to be added as methods of MarshalOptions and
UnmarshalOptions rather than top-level functions, separate the options
from the input structs.
Also update options passed to fast-path methods to set AllowPartial and
Merge to reflect the expected behavior of those methods. (Always allow
partial, never merge.)
Change-Id: I482477b0c9340793be533e75a86d0bb88708716a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215877
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
We may want to make changes to the inputs and outputs of the fast-path
functions in the future. For example, we likely want to add the ability
for the fast-path unmarshal to report back whether the unmarshaled
message is known to be initialized.
Change the signatures of these functions to take in and return struct
types which can be extended with whatever fields we want in the future.
Change-Id: Idead360785df730283a4630ea405265b72482e62
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215719
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Promote the fast-path magic ProtoMethods method to first-class citizen
of the protoreflect.Message interface.
To avoid polluting the protoreflect package with the various types
required by this method, make the necessary protoiface types unnamed and
duplicate them in protoreflect.
Updates golang/protobuf#1022.
Change-Id: I9595bae40b3bc7536d727fb6f99b3bce8f73da87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215718
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add a missed case in validation so we correctly validate bytes fields.
Fixes a case where we would report required bytes fields as potentially
missing.
Change-Id: I3dc4196d6995942d32a795a64214b3679d60ab6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215000
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
The fast-path unmarshal was getting confused when parsing a group
containing a field with a number the same as the group's own field
number. Separate the handling of EndGroup tags.
Change-Id: I637702b42c94a26102e693ee29a55e80b37d7f28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/214737
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Avoid dots and dashes in the directory to avoid issues on
build systems that cannot support them well.
Change-Id: I7ea5e6ce0b16c7158c7e53bcf5c3c1a334fe4718
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/214342
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Remove support for running benchmarks with APIv1.
The comparisons have served their purpose, and this removes the last
dependency on the github.com/golang/protobuf module.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#962.
Change-Id: I55758e19451fcd16ab1a5d66244eb8214ceb9fa7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/214040
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
If a map value is a message with required fields, the validator should
note that it is uninitialized if a map item contains no value. In this
case, the value is an empty message which obviously does not have the
required field set.
Change-Id: I7698e60765e3c95478f293e121bba3ad7fc88e27
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213900
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
This adds a experimental function to the internal/impl package which
validates a wire-format message against a message type. The validator
reports whether the message can be successfully unmarshaled, and whether
the result is initialized (all required fields are set). In some cases,
the validator returns ambiguous results when full validation would be
expensive.
The validator is unused outside of tests. In the future, it may be used
to permit lazy unmarshaling of some data. It is being added now for
testing; in particular, the wire fuzzer now checks the validator output
for consistency with the unmarshaler.
The validator adds a small amount of unused per-MessageType state. If
this becomes a concern, we could conditionalize it with a build tag.
Change-Id: I4216ef81d6a9ed975302eed189b02d08608858b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/212302
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Implementations of the legacy Marshaler type have no way to efficiently
compute the size of the message. Rather than generating an inefficient
fast-path Size method which marshals the message and examines the
length of the result, don't generate a fast-path at all.
Drop the requirement that a fast-path MarshalAppend requires a
corresponding Size.
Avoids O(N^2) behavior when marshaling a legacy Marshaler that
recursively calls proto.Marshal.
Change-Id: I4793cf32275d08f29c8e1a1a44a193d9a5724058
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213443
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
We resisted adding Clone for a while since:
* It is a function that is perfectly suited for generics.
However, generics probably still won't be available in Go for some time
and it is impractical to block addition of this function when it is very
widely used and will be necessary for the v1 to v2 migration.
* In the past, there was no protoreflect.Message.IsValid, so there was
no proper API to detect invalid top-level messages and return them as such.
Since Clone relies on certain properties about proper round-tripping
of ProtoMessage.ProtoReflect <-> Message.Interface, we add a test
in testing/prototest to check for this.
Change-Id: Ic492b68f27b8b88322a6a3fa3a5e492228db79d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213297
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
A shallow copy of a message is a common operation with over 10k
usages inside Google. However, the semantics of a shallow copy
on the struct is ill-defined and not officially supported by
the generated protobuf API.
To reduce improper usages, add an official implementation of
shallow merging that does something similar where messages, lists,
and maps are shallow copied into the destination if it does not
already have one populated.
In the common case where the destination is empty, this equivalent to:
src.Range(func(fd protoreflect.FieldDescriptor, v protoreflect.Value) bool {
dst.Set(fd, v)
})
if len(src.GetUnknown()) > 0 {
dst.SetUnknown(src.GetUnknown())
}
which is as simple of a shallow copy definition as you can get.
A future CL will add a fast-path implementation of both
deep and shallow merges.
Change-Id: Ic4a5503dd1b11b505738f5e503f97d55997e9418
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213131
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The v1 proto.Equal function treats (*Message)(nil) and new(Message)
as being different, while v2 proto.Equal treated them as equal since
a typed nil pointer is functionally an empty message since the
protobuf data model has no concept of presence as a first-class
property of messages.
Unfortunately, a significant amount of code depends on this distinction
that it would be difficult to migrate users from v1 to v2 unless we
preserved similar semantics in the v2 proto.Equal.
Also, double down on these semantics for protocmp.Transform.
Fixes#965
Change-Id: I21e78ba6251401a0ac0ccf495188093973cd7f3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213238
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The size calculation for packed repeated extension fields was
considering a zero-length list as encoding to a zero-length
wire.BytesType field, rather than being omitted entirely.
Change-Id: I7d4424a21ca8afd4fa81391caede49cadb4e2505
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/212297
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Fix a bug in handling the case where the encoding for a map item places
the value field (2) before the key field (1).
Change-Id: I2e6ad9af729a199e960e566ed7ef96bba3726990
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/211804
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Move the test inputs for the wire marshaler and unmarshaler out of
decode_test.go and into a new file. Consolidate some tests for invalid
messages (UTF-8 validation failures, field numbers out of range) into
a single list of invalid messages. Break out the no-enforce-utf8 test
into a separate file, since it is both complicated and conditional on
legacy support.
Change-Id: Ide80fa9d3aec2b6d42a57e6f9265358aa5e661a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/211557
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
When loading a *MessageInfo for a legacy message type, check to see if
the Go type contains at least one field which looks like a message
field. Specifically, look for at least one field with a `protobuf:` tag,
or an XXX_unrecognized field.
If a message has no recognizable fields, assume that it's something we
don't know how to interpret and treat it as an aberrant message.
Change-Id: If5c09087f1a0187271c98539d761395a2ee70a9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/210617
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
The deprecated messageset format permits extension fields with numbers
greater than the usual maximum (1<<29-1). To support this, the
internal/encoding/wire package has disabled field number validation when
legacy support is enabled.
We shouldn't skip validating all field numbers for validity just because
we support larger ones in messagesets.
This change drops range validation from the wire package (other than
checking that numbers fit in an int32) and adds it to the wire
unmarshalers instead. This gives us validation where we care
about it (when unmarshaling a wire-format message) and allows for
best-effort handling of out-of-range numbers everywhere else.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#996
Change-Id: I4e11b8a8aa177dd60e89723570af074a317c2451
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/210290
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The fast-path decoder decodes zero-length repeated bytes values as
non-nil, zero-length []bytes. Do the same in the reflection decoder.
This isn't really a correctness issue, since there's no ambiguity about what a
nil entry in a [][]byte means. Still a good idea for consistency, and
retains v1 behavior.
Change-Id: Icd2cb726d14ff1f2b9f142e65756777a359971f3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/210257
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
