TestNil checks for panic behavior for all top-level functions that
accept messages to ensure that we can detect when behavior changes
whether accidentally or deliberately.
This test discovered that the pure protobuf reflect behavior
differs with the fast-path implementation for a few cases.
For the protobuf reflection implementation, we explicitly check
for invalid messages in Merge and Reset. Previously, these would
not panic if the message was already empty (i.e., had no need to
actually set/clear any fields in the receiver message).
Change-Id: I571c0a819366bae993ce7c99b05fb4707e55cd3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220958
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Remove a stray bit of punctuation that crept into one of the license
headers and got copied around everywhere.
Change-Id: Iebe4e882650ab6dab28f132b5e324e2ab0b99a73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220339
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TODOs that we do not intend to address have been deleted.
Those that are blocking v2 release are marked with "blocks".
Change-Id: I7efa9e546d0637b562101d0edc7009893d762722
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/218878
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
We change Unmarshal to reset a message by default.
* We add a Merge option to UnmarshalOptions for explicit merging.
* We speed up Reset by checking for the Reset method.
* Remove TODOs in prototext and protojson about reset behavior.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#890
Change-Id: Ibd8963c741053f564acf061fbdb846699942109c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/195457
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Fix a bug where using Message.Range alone does not clear
memory references for empty, but allocated lists and maps.
Thus, we iterate over every known field and explicitly call Clear.
Change-Id: I9c1847d4056cf66f3199947150f3140d0783444a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183197
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Added API:
Message.Len
Message.Range
Message.Has
Message.Clear
Message.Get
Message.Set
Message.Mutable
Message.NewMessage
Message.WhichOneof
Message.GetUnknown
Message.SetUnknown
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
Message.KnownFields
Message.UnknownFields
The primary difference with the new API is that the top-level
Message methods are keyed by FieldDescriptor rather than FieldNumber
with the following semantics:
* For known fields, the FieldDescriptor must exactly match the
field descriptor known by the message.
* For extension fields, the FieldDescriptor must implement ExtensionType,
where ContainingMessage.FullName matches the message name, and
the field number is within the message's extension range.
When setting an extension field, it automatically stores
the extension type information.
* Extension fields are always considered nullable,
implying that repeated extension fields are nullable.
That is, you can distinguish between a unpopulated list and an empty list.
* Message.Get always returns a valid Value even if unpopulated.
The behavior is already well-defined for scalars, but for unpopulated
composite types, it now returns an empty read-only version of it.
Change-Id: Ia120630b4db221aeaaf743d0f64160e1a61a0f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175458
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
