Temporarily remove go.mod, since we can't generate an accurate one until
the corresponding v1 change is submitted.
Change-Id: I1e1ad97f2b455e33f61ffaeb8676289795e47e72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177000
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This change was created by running:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i "s|google.golang.org/proto|github.com/golang/protobuf/v2|g"
This change is *not* an endorsement of "github.com/golang/protobuf/v2" as the
final import path when the v2 API is eventually released as stable.
We continue to reserve the right to make breaking changes as we see fit.
This change enables us to host the v2 API on a repository that is go-gettable
(since go.googlesource.com is not a known host by the "go get" tool;
and google.golang.org/proto was just a stub URL that is not currently served).
Thus, we can start work on a forked version of the v1 API that explores
what it would take to implement v1 in terms of v2 in a backwards compatible way.
Change-Id: Ia3ebc41ac4238af62ee140200d3158b53ac9ec48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136736
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This is purely for consistent output with the previous protoc-gen-go.
Consider this message:
message M {
oneof union { string conflict = 1; }
message Conflict {}
}
The type for the wrapper of M.conflict will have the same name as the
embedded message type for M.Conflict.
The previous protoc-gen-go performs a disambiguation step where it adds
_s to the names of oneof field types until they have no conflicts with
nested messages or enums in the same message as the field.
There are a number of ways in which this can fail, of course. Preserve
the behavior for now.
Change-Id: I78a1c6588b577324e003b8bc337b75bb363432ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136357
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This produces exactly the same output as github.com/golang/protobuf.
Change-Id: I01aacc9277c5cb5b4cc295f5ee8af12b4a524781
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134955
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
