Added API:
Message.Len
Message.Range
Message.Has
Message.Clear
Message.Get
Message.Set
Message.Mutable
Message.NewMessage
Message.WhichOneof
Message.GetUnknown
Message.SetUnknown
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
Message.KnownFields
Message.UnknownFields
The primary difference with the new API is that the top-level
Message methods are keyed by FieldDescriptor rather than FieldNumber
with the following semantics:
* For known fields, the FieldDescriptor must exactly match the
field descriptor known by the message.
* For extension fields, the FieldDescriptor must implement ExtensionType,
where ContainingMessage.FullName matches the message name, and
the field number is within the message's extension range.
When setting an extension field, it automatically stores
the extension type information.
* Extension fields are always considered nullable,
implying that repeated extension fields are nullable.
That is, you can distinguish between a unpopulated list and an empty list.
* Message.Get always returns a valid Value even if unpopulated.
The behavior is already well-defined for scalars, but for unpopulated
composite types, it now returns an empty read-only version of it.
Change-Id: Ia120630b4db221aeaaf743d0f64160e1a61a0f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175458
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Temporarily remove go.mod, since we can't generate an accurate one until
the corresponding v1 change is submitted.
Change-Id: I1e1ad97f2b455e33f61ffaeb8676289795e47e72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177000
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Added API:
FieldDescriptor.IsExtension
FieldDescriptor.IsList
FieldDescriptor.MapKey
FieldDescriptor.MapValue
FieldDescriptor.ContainingOneof
FieldDescriptor.ContainingMessage
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
FieldDescriptor.Oneof
FieldDescriptor.Extendee
These methods help cleanup several common usage patterns.
Change-Id: I9a3ffabc2edb2173c536509b22f330f98bba7cf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/176977
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Added methods:
Enum.Descriptor
Message.Descriptor
EnumType.Descriptor
MessageType.Descriptor
ExtensionType.Descriptor
Message.New
All functionality is switched over to use those methods instead of
implicitly relying on the fact that {Enum,Message}Type implicitly
implement the associated descriptor interface.
This CL does not yet remove {Enum,Message}.Type or prevent
{Enum,Message,Extension}Type from implementating a descriptor.
That is a subsequent CL.
The Message.New method is also added to replace functionality
that will be lost when the Type methods are removed.
Change-Id: I7fefde1673bbd40bfdac489aca05cec9a6c98eb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/174918
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
The protobuf type system uses the word "descriptor" instead of "type".
We should avoid the "type" verbage when we aren't talking about Go types.
The old names are temporarily kept around for compatibility reasons.
Change-Id: Icc99c913528ead011f7a74aa8399d9c5ec6dc56e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/172238
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Move all checks for required fields into a proto.IsInitialized function.
Initial testing makes me confident that we can provide a fast-path
implementation of IsInitialized which will perform more than
acceptably. (In the degenerate-but-common case where a message
transitively contains no required fields, this check can be nearly
zero cost.)
Unifying checks into a single function provides consistent behavior
between the wire, text, and json codecs.
Performing the check after decoding eliminates the wire decoder bug
where a split message is incorrectly seen as missing required fields.
Performing the check after decoding also provides consistent and
arguably more correct behavior when the target message was partially
prepopulated.
Change-Id: I9478b7bebb263af00c0d9f66a1f26e31ff553522
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170787
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
