Rename build tag "proto1_legacy" -> "protolegacy"
to be consistent with the "protoreflect" tag.
Rename flag constant "Proto1Legacy" -> "ProtoLegacy" since
it covers more than simply proto1 legacy features.
For example, it covers alpha-features of proto3 that
were eventually removed from the final proto3 release.
Change-Id: I0f4fcbadd4b5a61c87645e2e5be11d187e59157c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/189345
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This CL unifies common MessageSet logic in prototext and protojson
into the messageset package. While we are at it, also enable
MessageSet support only if the proto1_legacy build flag is enabled.
Change-Id: I1a7d475e8bb1dad61ecd286df45e4239e5bef072
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185898
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
CL/174938 removed these methods in favor of a method that returned
only the descriptors. This CL adds back in the Type methods alongside
the Descriptor methods.
In a vast majority of protobuf usages, only the descriptor information
is needed. However, there is a small percentage that legitimately needs
the Go type information. We should provide both, but document that the
descriptor-only information is preferred.
Change-Id: Ia0a098997fb1bd009994940ae8ea5257ccd87cae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/184578
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Immediately abort (un)marshal operations when encountering invalid UTF-8
data in proto3 strings. No other proto implementation supports non-UTF-8
data in proto3 strings (and many reject it in proto2 strings as well).
Producing invalid output is an interoperability threat (other
implementations won't be able to read it).
The case where existing string data is found to contain non-UTF8 data is
better handled by changing the field to the `bytes` type, which (aside
from UTF-8 validation) is wire-compatible with `string`.
Remove the errors.NonFatal type, since there are no remaining cases
where it is needed. "Non-fatal" errors which produce results and a
non-nil error are problematic because they compose poorly; the better
approach is to take an option like AllowPartial indicating which
conditions to check for.
Change-Id: I9d189ec6ffda7b5d96d094aa1b290af2e3f23736
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183098
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The text and JSON encodings for the google.protobuf.Any well-known type
require a call to proto.Unmarshal. Plumb through the resolver from the
UnmarshalOptions.
Change-Id: Iccc1a9d56acd9dd214f2b289216bd50acc2ef074
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/182980
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Added API:
Message.Len
Message.Range
Message.Has
Message.Clear
Message.Get
Message.Set
Message.Mutable
Message.NewMessage
Message.WhichOneof
Message.GetUnknown
Message.SetUnknown
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
Message.KnownFields
Message.UnknownFields
The primary difference with the new API is that the top-level
Message methods are keyed by FieldDescriptor rather than FieldNumber
with the following semantics:
* For known fields, the FieldDescriptor must exactly match the
field descriptor known by the message.
* For extension fields, the FieldDescriptor must implement ExtensionType,
where ContainingMessage.FullName matches the message name, and
the field number is within the message's extension range.
When setting an extension field, it automatically stores
the extension type information.
* Extension fields are always considered nullable,
implying that repeated extension fields are nullable.
That is, you can distinguish between a unpopulated list and an empty list.
* Message.Get always returns a valid Value even if unpopulated.
The behavior is already well-defined for scalars, but for unpopulated
composite types, it now returns an empty read-only version of it.
Change-Id: Ia120630b4db221aeaaf743d0f64160e1a61a0f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175458
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Instead of accepting a concrete protoregistry.Types type,
accept an interface that provides the necessary functionality
to perform the serialization.
The advantages of this approach:
* There is no need for complex logic to allow a Parent or custom
Resolver on the protoregistry.Types type.
* Users can pass their own custom resolver implementations directly
to the serialization functions.
* This is a more principled approach to plumbing custom resolvers
than the previous approach of overloading behavior on the concrete
Types type.
The disadvantages of this approach:
* A pointer to a concrete type is 8B, while an interface is 16B.
However, the expansion of the {Marshal,Unmarshal}Options structs
should be a concern solved separately from how to plumb custom resolvers.
* The resolver interfaces as defined today may be insufficient to
provide functionality needed in the future if protobuf expands its
feature set. For example, let's suppose the Any message permits
directly representing a enum by name. This would require the ability
to lookup an enum by name. To support that hypothetical need,
we can document that the serializers type-assert the provided Resolver
to a EnumTypeResolver and use that if possible. There is some loss
of type safety with this approach, but provides a clear path forward.
Change-Id: I81ca80e59335d36be6b43d57ec8e17abfdfa3bad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177044
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Rename encoding/*pb to follow the convention of prefixing package names
with 'proto':
google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protojson
google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/prototext
Move protogen under a compiler/ directory, just in case we ever do add
more compiler-related packages.
google.golang.org/protobuf/compiler/protogen
Change-Id: I31010cb5cabcea8274fffcac468477b58b56e8eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177178
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
