The proto package tests often test several variations of messages with a
similar shape. For example, most tests are performed with a proto2
message with a regular field, a proto2 message with an extension field,
and a proto3 message.
Add a protobuild package which can initialize all these variations from
a single template. For example, these three messages:
&testpb.TestAllTypes{OptionalInt32: proto.Int32(1)}
&test3pb.TestAllTypes{OptionalInt32: 1}
m := &testpb.TestAllExtensions{}
proto.SetExtension(m, &testpb.E_OptionalInt32, 1)
can all be constructed from the template:
protobuild.Message{"optional_int32": 1}
This reduces redundancy in tests and will make it more practical to
test alternative code generators.
Change-Id: I3245a4bf74ee1bce957bc772fed513d427720677
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/217457
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Tweak the test message to allow creating messages with extensions that
contain extensions that contain extensions, etc.
Change-Id: I41844ae699c88ab96bf0d30db3a3fbaf09616161
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216761
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
The v1 proto.Equal function treats (*Message)(nil) and new(Message)
as being different, while v2 proto.Equal treated them as equal since
a typed nil pointer is functionally an empty message since the
protobuf data model has no concept of presence as a first-class
property of messages.
Unfortunately, a significant amount of code depends on this distinction
that it would be difficult to migrate users from v1 to v2 unless we
preserved similar semantics in the v2 proto.Equal.
Also, double down on these semantics for protocmp.Transform.
Fixes#965
Change-Id: I21e78ba6251401a0ac0ccf495188093973cd7f3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/213238
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This CL adds the following helper options:
func IgnoreEnums(...protoreflect.Enum) cmp.Option
func IgnoreMessages(...proto.Message) cmp.Option
func IgnoreFields(proto.Message, ...protoreflect.Name) cmp.Option
func IgnoreOneofs(proto.Message, ...protoreflect.Name) cmp.Option
func IgnoreDescriptors(...protoreflect.Descriptor) cmp.Option
func IgnoreDefaultScalars() cmp.Option
func IgnoreEmptyMessages() cmp.Option
func IgnoreUnknown() cmp.Option
It also augments transformMessage to unmarshal and expand Any messages
with the value of the underlying message. At this moment in time
we do not provide an API to provide a custom type resolver.
Change-Id: I51e1d9ff0d56d71161e510f366a7dcc32236d760
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/204577
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Accessing Number as a method, rather than a field paves the
way to have Enum potentially implement protoreflect.Enum
in the future.
Change-Id: Iebe9c0ec12e067decf2121d12fe2fb1549477b32
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/207077
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
High-level API:
func Transform() cmp.Option
type Enum struct{ ... }
type Message map[string]interface{}
The Transform function transform messages into a Message type that
cmp.Equal and cmp.Diff then knows how to traverse and compare.
Change-Id: I445f3b5c69f054b6984f28c205cda69e44af3b89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/164680
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
