I have choosen to implement this via interace assertion so that
other implementers of protoreflect.FileDescriptor can implement
this as well.
Change-Id: Ib907895044e89bdba1009cc09129d3dd1224561f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/573055
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This change removes the remaining usages of Syntax() from Go Protobuf
and uses edition features instead.
It also adds a new function to the EnumDescriptor interface checking if
the enum is using a Closed semantics.
All of these changes were tested on the Google corpus.
Change-Id: I7a8110f6f3b6ed24bf7ece500b4942371302c56c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/572695
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This is the first of multiple changes to add protobuf editions support
to the Go implementation.
This change includes the feature resolutions for protobuf editions.
The plugin does not yet report editions support and protoc would fail
if it invoked this plugin with a proto that uses editions.
Change-Id: I7d31909366c3433b21abab74ec92263e08145434
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/547315
Auto-Submit: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
This should be slightly more efficient and insulate this code from
changes to the internal representation/alignment of slices and strings.
The interface header lacks an unsafe constructor but is also tweaked
to follow any future alignment changes, if they should occur.
Change-Id: I54a3a93f248d3eef883d5ebf9ed75cc1f5c20977
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/547336
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
This updates all generated code to match the contents of the latest
v25.0-rc2 release candidate of Protobuf. This provides access to the
various new fields and types defined in google/protobuf/descriptor.proto.
Change-Id: I209f8509f2d3e9a0ac7d9e134caef38c48a0d16b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/538075
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Modernize the documentation across the entire module
to make use of the newer ability to linkify declarations.
Change-Id: I440f9a3f025ec6fadfd9cba59b1dfb57028bf3f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/309430
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This updates all generated code to match the contents of the latest
v24.0-rc2 release candidate of Protobuf. This provides access to the
various new fields and types defined in google/protobuf/descriptor.proto.
Change-Id: I8ec56b308dd7eed52fb9b17b258a45d0669c47ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/512795
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Update to a protobuf version that contains a fix for
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/12173
(macOS build error).
Set "CC=clang" when building the protobuf repo on macOS,
which fixes build errors on my machine (macOS 13.3.1, M1).
Change-Id: Id8abb054479454b7ccbded5a6fa4d74f3d3c236d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/489315
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
This updates all generated code to match the contents of the latest
v22.0 release of Protobuf.
This involved a couple of changes to the script that does the sync'ing:
1. The new Protobuf version no longer includes autoconf configuration
and instead requires using bazel to build things.
2. The new Protobuf release does not have an artifact named
"protobuf-all-${VERSION}.tar.gz", but the one named
"protobuf-${VERSION}.tar.gz" has all of the sources and was
sufficient for the regenerate.bash script to complete.
This change does NOT regenerate the protos related to benchmarks.
The Protobuf repo no longer includes benchmarks. The CL removing them
says they are superceded by google/fleetbench:
83c499de86
But that project's proto benchmark files are very different:
https://github.com/google/fleetbench/tree/main/fleetbench/proto
So I commented out those steps in the generation code since the benchmarks
will need some work to reconcile with fleetbench.
This code adds known failing tests for conformance. New test cases were
added in https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/9534, but the
Go protojson package does not behave according to the new tests. There
is an existing issue in GitHub about this:
https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1208
Change-Id: Iad796ec7889bc2a74b58db5224facf850cd1a1cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/469255
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Fix typos in comments and unexported function name.
Change-Id: I239fff85bc68d7f0ef6f8853acdc9bbe19d86304
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/466535
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
The Value.Equal method compares Values in a way that is
analogous to the reflect.DeepEqual function.
Most of the implementation is moved from the "proto" package,
with proto.Equal implemented in terms of protoreflect.Value.Equal.
Change-Id: Ie9d5f6c073dc49fa59f78385c441db8137de5ec5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/450775
TryBot-Bypass: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleksii Prokopchuk <prokopchuk@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Höppner <hoeppi@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
I updated the protoc version to 21.5 and ran regenerate.bash.
This updates the various *.pb.go files to use the sources from
the latest protobuf release. In particular, this updates the
descriptorpb, so it includes some changes to descriptor.proto
in the past year and a half since this was last re-generated.
The change also pulled over several other generated changes.
Change-Id: Icd9c4e5d47ba85e1f4bae1d0a025f8dec15a3014
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/426054
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
Apply go1.19 gofmt to non-generated files.
Generated .pb.go files are created by generate.bash using Go 1.18,
so leave them unchanged for now.
Change-Id: Ied36c83cf99704988d059bf0412e677f0fbc71b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/418676
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
There are a number of message types, which can be confusing.
Expand the documentation. In particular, use Go's reflection model
as an analogy, which helps users if they are at least familiar
with how Go reflection works. After all, protobuf reflection
was modeled after Go reflection to a large degree.
Change-Id: I388ae41c792905145ccc86dc938b901a2b79f408
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/399654
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Auto-Submit: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse Folger <lassefolger@google.com>
+ This change introduce a default and configurable depth limit for
proto.Unmarshal. If a message is nested deeper than the limit,
unmarshaling will fail. There are two ways to nest messages. Either by
having fields which are message types itself or by using groups.
+ The default limit is 10,000 for now. This might change in the future
to align it with other language implementation (C++ and Java use 100
as limit).
+ If pure groups (groups that don't contain message fields) are nested
deeper than the default limit the unmarshaling fails with:
proto: cannot parse invalid wire-format data
+ Note: the configured limit does not apply to pure groups.
+ This change is introduced to improve security and robustness. Because
unmarshaling is implemented using recursion it can lead to stack overflows
for certain inputs. The introduced limit protects against this.
+ A secondary motivation for this limit is the alignment with other
languages. Protocol buffers are a language interoperability mechanism
and thus either all implementations should accept the input or all
implementation should reject the input.
Change-Id: I14bdb44d06e4bd1aa90d6336c2cf6446003b2037
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/385854
Trust: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Trust: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Hillegeer <aktau@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chressie Himpel <chressie@google.com>
Added API:
SourceLocations.ByPath
SourceLocations.ByDescriptor
SourceLocation.Next
SourcePath.String
SourcePath.Equal
We modify compiler/protogen to use SourceLocations.ByDescriptor.
In retrospect, if this had existed during the development of protogen,
we would not have exposed protogen.Location and related fields.
Change-Id: I58f17e59f90b9ba16f0982c4b71c2542e4ff6e75
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/238000
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The MessageFieldTypes interface (if implemented by a MessageType)
provides Go type information about the fields if they are
an enum or message type.
Change-Id: I68b20f5726377f6b0f2c20a8b6e45f9802b43f67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/236777
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Add a new TextName accessor that returns the field name that should
be used for the text format. It is usually just the field name, except:
1) it uses the inlined message name for groups,
2) uses the full name surrounded by brackets for extensions, and
3) strips the "message_set_extension" for well-formed extensions
to the proto1 MessageSet.
We make similar adjustments to the JSONName accessor so that it applies
similar semantics for extensions.
The two changes simplifies all logic that wants the humanly readable
name for a field.
Change-Id: I524b6e017fb955146db81819270fe197f8f97980
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/239838
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
For simplicity, IsValid was implemented in terms of regular expressions,
which are useful for verifying a string according to a strict grammar,
but performs poorly. Implement the check in terms of hand-written code,
which provides a 20x improvement to validate the name "google.protobuf.Any".
name old time/op new time/op delta
FullNameIsValid-8 683ns ± 2% 35ns ± 1% -94.86% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I980403befca0b72cea22acd274064a46cb02644b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/238002
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
A common mistake is to pass proto.Message to protoreflect.ValueOf
instead of a protoreflect.Message. Specialize for this case
and provide a panic message that is more helpful.
Change-Id: I5def43341aa9607182edde309dea2823e61c1fdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/234117
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
In the upcoming 3.12.x release of protoc, the proto3 language will be
amended to support true presence for scalars. This CL adds support
to both the generator and runtime to support these semantics.
Newly added public API:
protogen.Plugin.SupportedFeatures
protoreflect.FieldDescriptor.HasPresence
protoreflect.FieldDescriptor.HasOptionalKeyword
protoreflect.OneofDescriptor.IsSynthetic
Change-Id: I7c86bf66d0ae56642109beb5f2132184593747ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/230698
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Expand the mention of the protodesc package to indicate that it can
construct protoreflect.Descriptors from the descriptor messages, but
also convert a protoreflect.Descriptor back to the message form.
Change-Id: I9f3d75c6050fff603655ee0a4e8e29d0a2c0cf84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/221611
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
An Is prefix implies it returns a boolean.
A Check prefix better suggests that it could return an error.
Change-Id: I6ffcb32099a944c656c07654c294a0980efb2d0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220338
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The IsInitialized flag is unused and unnecessary as the error returned
inherently reports whether a message is uninitialized if it is non-nil.
Also cleanup the documentation in protoiface of stale references.
Change-Id: Id75772f4f75f8d7a2a9fbe772d57f7d69ae9fb9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220337
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Move all fast-path inputs and outputs into the Input/Output structs.
Collapse all booleans into bitfields.
Change-Id: I79ebfbac9cd1d8ef5ec17c4f955311db007391ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/219505
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add methods to add a new, mutable message to a list or map, matching the
existing Message.Mutable.
These methods are purely a convenience, as each can be implemented in
terms of the existing interface.
Change-Id: I889c20fe37ea0f2a566555212e99e6378fb9fe1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/220117
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
There were a few stale references due to renamed identifiers.
Change-Id: I0ac7eda93c46143292799c3806214dc89f1e80cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/219504
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
After a header, there needs to be a paragraph in order for godoc
to recognize the header as a header.
Change-Id: I6c814b24dbb5eb2d5efcb0040556521c05587393
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/219140
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TODOs that we do not intend to address have been deleted.
Those that are blocking v2 release are marked with "blocks".
Change-Id: I7efa9e546d0637b562101d0edc7009893d762722
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/218878
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Change the representation of option flags in protoiface from bools to a
bitfield. This brings the representation of options in protoiface in
sync with that in internal/impl.
This change has several benefits:
1. We will probably find that we need to add more option flags over time.
Converting to the more efficient representation of these flags as high
in the call stack as possible minimizes the performance implication of
the struct growing.
2. On a similar note, this avoids the need to convert from the compact
representation to the larger one when passing from internal/impl to
proto, since the {Marshal,Unmarshal}State methods take the compact form.
3. This removes unused options from protoiface. Instead of documenting
that AllowPartial is always set, we can just not include an AllowPartial
flag in the protoiface options.
4. Conversely, this provides a way to add option flags to protoiface
that we don't want to expose in the proto package.
name old time/op new time/op delta
EmptyMessage/Wire/Marshal-12 11.1ns ± 7% 10.1ns ± 1% -9.35% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
EmptyMessage/Wire/Unmarshal-12 7.07ns ± 0% 6.74ns ± 1% -4.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
EmptyMessage/Wire/Validate-12 4.30ns ± 1% 3.80ns ± 8% -11.45% (p=0.000 n=7+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Marshal-12 1.17µs ± 1% 1.21µs ± 7% +4.09% (p=0.000 n=8+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Unmarshal-12 938ns ± 0% 942ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.178 n=7+8)
RepeatedInt32/Wire/Validate-12 521ns ± 4% 543ns ± 7% ~ (p=0.157 n=7+8)
Required/Wire/Marshal-12 97.2ns ± 1% 95.3ns ± 1% -1.98% (p=0.001 n=7+7)
Required/Wire/Unmarshal-12 41.0ns ± 9% 38.6ns ± 3% -5.73% (p=0.048 n=8+8)
Required/Wire/Validate-12 25.4ns ±11% 21.4ns ± 3% -15.62% (p=0.000 n=8+7)
Change-Id: I3ac1b00ab36cfdf61316ec087a5dd20d9248e4f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/216760
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add a fast check for required fields to the fast path unmarshal.
This is best-effort and will fail to detect some initialized
messages: Messages with more than 64 required fields, messages
split across multiple tags, possibly other cases.
In the cases where it works (which is most of them in practice),
this permits us to skip the IsInitialized check.
Change-Id: I6b70953a333033a5e64fb7ca37a59786cb0f75a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215878
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Add functions to the proto package which plumb through the fast-path state.
As a sample use case: A followup CL adds an Initialized field to
protoiface.UnmarshalOutput, permitting the unmarshaller to report back
when it can confirm that a message is fully initialized. We want to
preserve that information when an unmarshal operation threads through
the proto package (such as when unmarshaling extensions).
To allow these functions to be added as methods of MarshalOptions and
UnmarshalOptions rather than top-level functions, separate the options
from the input structs.
Also update options passed to fast-path methods to set AllowPartial and
Merge to reflect the expected behavior of those methods. (Always allow
partial, never merge.)
Change-Id: I482477b0c9340793be533e75a86d0bb88708716a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215877
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
We may want to make changes to the inputs and outputs of the fast-path
functions in the future. For example, we likely want to add the ability
for the fast-path unmarshal to report back whether the unmarshaled
message is known to be initialized.
Change the signatures of these functions to take in and return struct
types which can be extended with whatever fields we want in the future.
Change-Id: Idead360785df730283a4630ea405265b72482e62
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215719
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Promote the fast-path magic ProtoMethods method to first-class citizen
of the protoreflect.Message interface.
To avoid polluting the protoreflect package with the various types
required by this method, make the necessary protoiface types unnamed and
duplicate them in protoreflect.
Updates golang/protobuf#1022.
Change-Id: I9595bae40b3bc7536d727fb6f99b3bce8f73da87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/215718
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Various protoreflect methods can return an "empty, read-only" message,
list, or map value. Provide a method to test if a value is one of these.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#966
Change-Id: I793d8426d6e2201755983c06f024412a7e09bc4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/209018
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Remove repeated extension fields from the set of nullable fields,
so that Has reports false and Range does not visit a a zero-length
repeated extension field.
This corrects a fuzzer-detected case where unmarshaling and remarshaling
a wire-format message could result in a semantic change. For a repeated
extension field in non-packed encoding, unmarshaling a packed
representation of the field would result in a message which Has the
extension. Remarshaling it would discard the the field.
Fixesgolang.org/protobuf#975
Change-Id: Ie836559c93d218db5b5201742a3b8ebbaacf54ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/204897
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
These methods are difficult or impossible to use correctly; types
created by the dynamicpb package, for example, all have the same GoType.
Fixesgolang/protobuf#938
Change-Id: I33d4ef381579ff18569b11df501d0ba7f38a6b5c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/199060
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Rather than using the <unknown:%d> syntax for GoString,
emit something similar to TypeName(%d),
which is functionally equivalent to casting the integer
to the specified type.
Change-Id: Ibf4bd680d1672fcaba9022fb6bd03bbfe249b8b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/191580
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
