Descriptor methods generally return a Descriptor with no Go type
information. ExtensionType's Descriptor is an exception, returning an
ExtensionTypeDescriptor containing both the proto descriptor and a
reference back to the ExtensionType. The pure descriptor is accessed
by xt.Descriptor().Descriptor().
Rename ExtensionType's Descriptor method to TypeDescriptor to make it
clear that it behaves a bit differently.
Change 1/2: Add the TypeDescriptor method and deprecate Descriptor.
Change-Id: I1806095044d35a474d60f94d2a28bdf528f12238
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/192139
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Change protoiface.ExtensionDescV1 to implement protoreflect.ExtensionType.
ExtensionDescV1's Name field conflicts with the Descriptor Name method,
so change the protoreflect.{Message,Enum,Extension}Type types to no
longer implement the corresponding Descriptor interface. This also leads
to a clearer distinction between the two types.
Introduce a protoreflect.ExtensionTypeDescriptor type which bridges
between ExtensionType and ExtensionDescriptor.
Add extension accessor functions to the proto package:
proto.{Has,Clear,Get,Set}Extension. These functions take a
protoreflect.ExtensionType parameter, which allows writing the
same function call using either the old or new API:
proto.GetExtension(message, somepb.E_ExtensionFoo)
Fixesgolang/protobuf#908
Change-Id: Ibc65d12a46666297849114fd3aefbc4a597d9f08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/189199
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
MessageSets are a deprecated proto1 feature, long since superseded by
extensions. Add disabled-by-default support behind flags.Proto1Legacy.
Change-Id: I7d3ace07f3b0efd59673034f3dc633b908345a88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185538
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
The following adjustments were made:
* The pragma.NoUnkeyedLiterals is moved to be the first field.
This is done to keep the options struct smaller. Even if the last
field is zero-length, Go GC implementation details forces the struct
to be padded at the end.
* Methods are documented as always treating AllowPartial as true.
* Added a support flag for UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown.
Change-Id: I1f75d226542ab2bb0123d9cea143c7060df226d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185998
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The proper semantics for a message field within a oneof
when unmarshaling is to merge into an existing message,
rather than replacing it.
Change-Id: I7c08f6e4fa958c6ee6241e9083f7311515a97e15
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185957
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Immediately abort (un)marshal operations when encountering invalid UTF-8
data in proto3 strings. No other proto implementation supports non-UTF-8
data in proto3 strings (and many reject it in proto2 strings as well).
Producing invalid output is an interoperability threat (other
implementations won't be able to read it).
The case where existing string data is found to contain non-UTF8 data is
better handled by changing the field to the `bytes` type, which (aside
from UTF-8 validation) is wire-compatible with `string`.
Remove the errors.NonFatal type, since there are no remaining cases
where it is needed. "Non-fatal" errors which produce results and a
non-nil error are problematic because they compose poorly; the better
approach is to take an option like AllowPartial indicating which
conditions to check for.
Change-Id: I9d189ec6ffda7b5d96d094aa1b290af2e3f23736
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/183098
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Added API:
Message.Len
Message.Range
Message.Has
Message.Clear
Message.Get
Message.Set
Message.Mutable
Message.NewMessage
Message.WhichOneof
Message.GetUnknown
Message.SetUnknown
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
Message.KnownFields
Message.UnknownFields
The primary difference with the new API is that the top-level
Message methods are keyed by FieldDescriptor rather than FieldNumber
with the following semantics:
* For known fields, the FieldDescriptor must exactly match the
field descriptor known by the message.
* For extension fields, the FieldDescriptor must implement ExtensionType,
where ContainingMessage.FullName matches the message name, and
the field number is within the message's extension range.
When setting an extension field, it automatically stores
the extension type information.
* Extension fields are always considered nullable,
implying that repeated extension fields are nullable.
That is, you can distinguish between a unpopulated list and an empty list.
* Message.Get always returns a valid Value even if unpopulated.
The behavior is already well-defined for scalars, but for unpopulated
composite types, it now returns an empty read-only version of it.
Change-Id: Ia120630b4db221aeaaf743d0f64160e1a61a0f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175458
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Instead of accepting a concrete protoregistry.Types type,
accept an interface that provides the necessary functionality
to perform the serialization.
The advantages of this approach:
* There is no need for complex logic to allow a Parent or custom
Resolver on the protoregistry.Types type.
* Users can pass their own custom resolver implementations directly
to the serialization functions.
* This is a more principled approach to plumbing custom resolvers
than the previous approach of overloading behavior on the concrete
Types type.
The disadvantages of this approach:
* A pointer to a concrete type is 8B, while an interface is 16B.
However, the expansion of the {Marshal,Unmarshal}Options structs
should be a concern solved separately from how to plumb custom resolvers.
* The resolver interfaces as defined today may be insufficient to
provide functionality needed in the future if protobuf expands its
feature set. For example, let's suppose the Any message permits
directly representing a enum by name. This would require the ability
to lookup an enum by name. To support that hypothetical need,
we can document that the serializers type-assert the provided Resolver
to a EnumTypeResolver and use that if possible. There is some loss
of type safety with this approach, but provides a clear path forward.
Change-Id: I81ca80e59335d36be6b43d57ec8e17abfdfa3bad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177044
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Temporarily remove go.mod, since we can't generate an accurate one until
the corresponding v1 change is submitted.
Change-Id: I1e1ad97f2b455e33f61ffaeb8676289795e47e72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/177000
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Added API:
FieldDescriptor.IsExtension
FieldDescriptor.IsList
FieldDescriptor.MapKey
FieldDescriptor.MapValue
FieldDescriptor.ContainingOneof
FieldDescriptor.ContainingMessage
Deprecated API (to be removed in subsequent CL):
FieldDescriptor.Oneof
FieldDescriptor.Extendee
These methods help cleanup several common usage patterns.
Change-Id: I9a3ffabc2edb2173c536509b22f330f98bba7cf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/176977
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Added methods:
Enum.Descriptor
Message.Descriptor
EnumType.Descriptor
MessageType.Descriptor
ExtensionType.Descriptor
Message.New
All functionality is switched over to use those methods instead of
implicitly relying on the fact that {Enum,Message}Type implicitly
implement the associated descriptor interface.
This CL does not yet remove {Enum,Message}.Type or prevent
{Enum,Message,Extension}Type from implementating a descriptor.
That is a subsequent CL.
The Message.New method is also added to replace functionality
that will be lost when the Type methods are removed.
Change-Id: I7fefde1673bbd40bfdac489aca05cec9a6c98eb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/174918
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
CL/172399 switches the v1 code to eagerly unmarshal extensions.
This CL does the equivalent for v2.
For the test, we simply switch from protoV1.Equal to protoV2.Equal,
since the v2 equal does not magically unmarshal raw extensions.
Change-Id: I6f64455b0a75bbc9a9a82108558641a29bd2b982
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/175838
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The protobuf type system uses the word "descriptor" instead of "type".
We should avoid the "type" verbage when we aren't talking about Go types.
The old names are temporarily kept around for compatibility reasons.
Change-Id: Icc99c913528ead011f7a74aa8399d9c5ec6dc56e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/172238
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Remove the Reflection field from MarshalOptions and UnmarshalOptions.
Disable the fast path and use the reflection-based implementation when
the 'protoreflect' build tag is set.
Change-Id: Ic674e3af67501de27fb03ec2712fbed40eae7fef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170896
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Move all checks for required fields into a proto.IsInitialized function.
Initial testing makes me confident that we can provide a fast-path
implementation of IsInitialized which will perform more than
acceptably. (In the degenerate-but-common case where a message
transitively contains no required fields, this check can be nearly
zero cost.)
Unifying checks into a single function provides consistent behavior
between the wire, text, and json codecs.
Performing the check after decoding eliminates the wire decoder bug
where a split message is incorrectly seen as missing required fields.
Performing the check after decoding also provides consistent and
arguably more correct behavior when the target message was partially
prepopulated.
Change-Id: I9478b7bebb263af00c0d9f66a1f26e31ff553522
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170787
Reviewed-by: Herbie Ong <herbie@google.com>
Allow message implementations to provide optimized versions of standard
operations. Generated messages now include a ProtoReflectMethods method,
returning a protoiface.Methods struct containing pointers to assorted
optional functions.
The Methods struct also includes a Flags field indicating support for
optional features such as deterministic marshaling.
Implementation of the fast paths (and tests) will come in later CLs.
Change-Id: Idd1beed0ecf43ec5e5e7b8da2ee1e08d3ce32213
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/170340
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Most usages of New actually prefer to interact with the reflective view
rather than the native Go type. Thus, change New to return that instead.
This parallels reflect.New, which returns the reflective view
(i.e., reflect.Value) instead of native type (i.e., interface{}).
We make the equivalent change to KnownFields.NewMessage, List.NewMessage,
and Map.NewMessage for consistency.
Since this is a subtle change where the type system will not always
catch the changed type, this change was made by both changing the type
and renaming the function to NewXXX and manually looking at every usage
of the the function to ensure that the usage correctly operates
on either the native Go type or the reflective view of the type.
After the entire codebase was cleaned up, a rename was performed to convert
NewXXX back to New.
Change-Id: I153fef627b4bf0a427e4039ce0aaec52e20c7950
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/157077
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
If a field has an ExtensionType defined, use it in decoding.
Change-Id: I85f3da0f52a11578500cf28e4611fa4eb31f0623
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154581
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Add proto.Unmarshal.
Test cases all produce identical results to the v1 unmarshaller.
Change-Id: I42259266018a14e88a650c5d83a043cb17a3a15d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153918
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
