protobuf-go/internal/impl/codec_extension.go

142 lines
4.1 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
// Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package impl
import (
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
"google.golang.org/protobuf/internal/encoding/wire"
pref "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
)
type extensionFieldInfo struct {
internal/impl: add fast-path unmarshal Benchmarks run with: go test ./benchmarks/ -bench=Wire -benchtime=500ms -benchmem -count=8 Fast-path vs. parent commit: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 1.35µs ± 2% 0.45µs ± 4% -67.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 1.07µs ± 1% 0.31µs ± 1% -71.04% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 691µs ± 2% 188µs ± 2% -72.78% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 60.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -58.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 42.0 ± 0% 7.0 ± 0% -83.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 28.6k ± 0% 8.5k ± 0% -70.34% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Fast-path vs. -v1: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 702ns ± 1% 445ns ± 4% -36.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 604ns ± 1% 311ns ± 1% -48.54% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 179µs ± 3% 188µs ± 2% +5.30% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 26.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -3.85% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 8.00 ± 0% 7.00 ± 0% -12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 8.49k ± 0% 8.49k ± 0% -0.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Change-Id: I6247ac3fd66a63d9acb902cbd192094ee3d151c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185147 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-06-27 10:54:42 -07:00
wiretag uint64
tagsize int
unmarshalNeedsValue bool
funcs ifaceCoderFuncs
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
}
func (mi *MessageInfo) extensionFieldInfo(xt pref.ExtensionType) *extensionFieldInfo {
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
// As of this time (Go 1.12, linux/amd64), an RWMutex benchmarks as faster
// than a sync.Map.
mi.extensionFieldInfosMu.RLock()
e, ok := mi.extensionFieldInfos[xt]
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
mi.extensionFieldInfosMu.RUnlock()
if ok {
return e
}
xd := xt.TypeDescriptor()
var wiretag uint64
if !xd.IsPacked() {
wiretag = wire.EncodeTag(xd.Number(), wireTypes[xd.Kind()])
} else {
wiretag = wire.EncodeTag(xd.Number(), wire.BytesType)
}
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
e = &extensionFieldInfo{
wiretag: wiretag,
tagsize: wire.SizeVarint(wiretag),
funcs: encoderFuncsForValue(xd, xt.GoType()),
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
}
internal/impl: add fast-path unmarshal Benchmarks run with: go test ./benchmarks/ -bench=Wire -benchtime=500ms -benchmem -count=8 Fast-path vs. parent commit: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 1.35µs ± 2% 0.45µs ± 4% -67.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 1.07µs ± 1% 0.31µs ± 1% -71.04% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 691µs ± 2% 188µs ± 2% -72.78% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 60.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -58.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 42.0 ± 0% 7.0 ± 0% -83.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 28.6k ± 0% 8.5k ± 0% -70.34% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Fast-path vs. -v1: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 702ns ± 1% 445ns ± 4% -36.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 604ns ± 1% 311ns ± 1% -48.54% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 179µs ± 3% 188µs ± 2% +5.30% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 26.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -3.85% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 8.00 ± 0% 7.00 ± 0% -12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 8.49k ± 0% 8.49k ± 0% -0.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Change-Id: I6247ac3fd66a63d9acb902cbd192094ee3d151c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185147 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-06-27 10:54:42 -07:00
// Does the unmarshal function need a value passed to it?
// This is true for composite types, where we pass in a message, list, or map to fill in,
// and for enums, where we pass in a prototype value to specify the concrete enum type.
switch xd.Kind() {
internal/impl: add fast-path unmarshal Benchmarks run with: go test ./benchmarks/ -bench=Wire -benchtime=500ms -benchmem -count=8 Fast-path vs. parent commit: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 1.35µs ± 2% 0.45µs ± 4% -67.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 1.07µs ± 1% 0.31µs ± 1% -71.04% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 691µs ± 2% 188µs ± 2% -72.78% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 60.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -58.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 42.0 ± 0% 7.0 ± 0% -83.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 28.6k ± 0% 8.5k ± 0% -70.34% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Fast-path vs. -v1: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 702ns ± 1% 445ns ± 4% -36.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 604ns ± 1% 311ns ± 1% -48.54% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 179µs ± 3% 188µs ± 2% +5.30% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 26.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -3.85% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 8.00 ± 0% 7.00 ± 0% -12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 8.49k ± 0% 8.49k ± 0% -0.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Change-Id: I6247ac3fd66a63d9acb902cbd192094ee3d151c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185147 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-06-27 10:54:42 -07:00
case pref.MessageKind, pref.GroupKind, pref.EnumKind:
e.unmarshalNeedsValue = true
default:
if xd.Cardinality() == pref.Repeated {
internal/impl: add fast-path unmarshal Benchmarks run with: go test ./benchmarks/ -bench=Wire -benchtime=500ms -benchmem -count=8 Fast-path vs. parent commit: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 1.35µs ± 2% 0.45µs ± 4% -67.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 1.07µs ± 1% 0.31µs ± 1% -71.04% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 691µs ± 2% 188µs ± 2% -72.78% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 60.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -58.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 42.0 ± 0% 7.0 ± 0% -83.33% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 28.6k ± 0% 8.5k ± 0% -70.34% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Fast-path vs. -v1: name old time/op new time/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 702ns ± 1% 445ns ± 4% -36.58% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 604ns ± 1% 311ns ± 1% -48.54% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 179µs ± 3% 188µs ± 2% +5.30% (p=0.000 n=7+8) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto2-12 26.0 ± 0% 25.0 ± 0% -3.85% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message1_proto3-12 8.00 ± 0% 7.00 ± 0% -12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Wire/Unmarshal/google_message2-12 8.49k ± 0% 8.49k ± 0% -0.01% (p=0.000 n=8+8) Change-Id: I6247ac3fd66a63d9acb902cbd192094ee3d151c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/185147 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-06-27 10:54:42 -07:00
e.unmarshalNeedsValue = true
}
}
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
mi.extensionFieldInfosMu.Lock()
if mi.extensionFieldInfos == nil {
mi.extensionFieldInfos = make(map[pref.ExtensionType]*extensionFieldInfo)
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
}
mi.extensionFieldInfos[xt] = e
internal/impl: add fast-path marshal implementation This is a port of the v1 table marshaler, with some substantial cleanup and refactoring. Benchstat results from the protobuf reference benchmark data comparing the v1 package with v2, with AllowPartial:true set for the new package. This is not an apples-to-apples comparison, since v1 doesn't have a way to disable required field checks. Required field checks in v2 package currently go through reflection, which performs terribly; my initial experimentation indicates that fast-path required field checks will not add a large amount of cost; these results are incomplete but not wholly inaccurate. name old time/op new time/op delta /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal-12 219ms ± 1% 232ms ± 1% +5.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal-12 261µs ± 3% 248µs ± 1% -5.14% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal-12 681ns ± 2% 637ns ± 3% -6.53% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal-12 1.10µs ± 8% 0.99µs ± 3% -9.63% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal-12 44.2ms ± 3% 35.2ms ± 1% -20.28% (p=0.004 n=6+5) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal-12 91.4ms ± 2% 94.9ms ± 2% +3.78% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal-12 78.7ms ± 6% 80.8ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.310 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal-12 10.6ms ± 3% 10.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.662 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal-12 675ms ± 4% 510ms ± 2% -24.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_1.pb/Marshal 219ms ± 1% 236ms ± 7% +8.06% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message2.pb/Marshal 257µs ± 1% 250µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.052 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message1_proto2.pb/Marshal 685ns ± 1% 628ns ± 1% -8.41% (p=0.008 n=5+5) /dataset.google_message1_proto3.pb/Marshal 1.08µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 2% -9.31% (p=0.004 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_3.pb/Marshal 43.7ms ± 1% 35.1ms ± 1% -19.76% (p=0.002 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message4.pb/Marshal 93.4ms ± 4% 94.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.180 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_2.pb/Marshal 105ms ± 2% 98ms ± 7% -6.81% (p=0.009 n=5+6) /dataset.google_message3_4.pb/Marshal 16.3ms ± 6% 15.7ms ± 3% -3.44% (p=0.041 n=6+6) /dataset.google_message3_5.pb/Marshal 676ms ± 4% 504ms ± 2% -25.50% (p=0.004 n=6+5) Change-Id: I72cc4597117f4cf5d236ef505777d49dd4a5f75d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/protobuf/+/171020 Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
2019-04-01 13:49:56 -07:00
mi.extensionFieldInfosMu.Unlock()
return e
}
type ExtensionField struct {
typ pref.ExtensionType
// value is either the value of GetValue,
// or a *lazyExtensionValue that then returns the value of GetValue.
value interface{} // TODO: switch to protoreflect.Value
}
func (f ExtensionField) HasType() bool {
return f.typ != nil
}
func (f ExtensionField) GetType() pref.ExtensionType {
return f.typ
}
func (f *ExtensionField) SetType(t pref.ExtensionType) {
f.typ = t
}
// HasValue reports whether a value is set for the extension field.
// This may be called concurrently.
func (f ExtensionField) HasValue() bool {
return f.value != nil
}
// GetValue returns the concrete value for the extension field.
// Let the type of Desc.ExtensionType be the "API type" and
// the type of GetValue be the "storage type".
// The API type and storage type are the same except:
// * for scalars (except []byte), where the API type uses *T,
// while the storage type uses T.
// * for repeated fields, where the API type uses []T,
// while the storage type uses *[]T.
//
// The reason for the divergence is so that the storage type more naturally
// matches what is expected of when retrieving the values through the
// protobuf reflection APIs.
//
// GetValue is only populated if Desc is also populated.
// This may be called concurrently.
//
// TODO: switch interface{} to protoreflect.Value
func (f ExtensionField) GetValue() interface{} {
if f, ok := f.value.(*lazyExtensionValue); ok {
return f.GetValue()
}
return f.value
}
// SetEagerValue sets the current value of the extension.
// This must not be called concurrently.
func (f *ExtensionField) SetEagerValue(v interface{}) {
f.value = v
}
// SetLazyValue sets a value that is to be lazily evaluated upon first use.
// The returned value must not be nil.
// This must not be called concurrently.
func (f *ExtensionField) SetLazyValue(v func() interface{}) {
f.value = &lazyExtensionValue{value: v}
}
type lazyExtensionValue struct {
once uint32 // atomically set if value is valid
mu sync.Mutex // protects value
value interface{} // either the value itself or a func() interface{}
}
func (v *lazyExtensionValue) GetValue() interface{} {
if atomic.LoadUint32(&v.once) == 0 {
v.mu.Lock()
if f, ok := v.value.(func() interface{}); ok {
v.value = f()
}
atomic.StoreUint32(&v.once, 1)
v.mu.Unlock()
}
return v.value
}