Conflict resolution:
* ChangeLog: put the new entry from my branch in the proper place.
* include/mbedtls/error.h: counted high-level module error codes again.
* include/mbedtls/ssl.h: picked different numeric codes for the
concurrently added errors; made the new error a full sentence per
current standards.
* library/error.c: ran scripts/generate_errors.pl.
* library/ssl_srv.c:
* ssl_prepare_server_key_exchange "DHE key exchanges": the conflict
was due to style corrections in development
(4cb1f4d49cff999d0c853bc696ad7eea68888c35) which I merged with
my refactoring.
* ssl_prepare_server_key_exchange "For key exchanges involving the
server signing", first case, variable declarations: merged line
by line:
* dig_signed_len: added in async
* signature_len: removed in async
* hashlen: type changed to size_t in development
* hash: size changed to MBEDTLS_MD_MAX_SIZE in async
* ret: added in async
* ssl_prepare_server_key_exchange "For key exchanges involving the
server signing", first cae comment: the conflict was due to style
corrections in development (4cb1f4d49cff999d0c853bc696ad7eea68888c35)
which I merged with my comment changes made as part of refactoring
the function.
* ssl_prepare_server_key_exchange "Compute the hash to be signed" if
`md_alg != MBEDTLS_MD_NONE`: conflict between
ebd652fe2dfc2c82d774bfd334398279d9027492
"ssl_write_server_key_exchange: calculate hashlen explicitly" and
46f5a3e9b4d5db3cacfe2ba33480a27317c62d46 "Check return codes from
MD in ssl code". I took the code from commit
ca1d74290439ec9e2723a911657fd96aa320e219 made on top of development
which makes mbedtls_ssl_get_key_exchange_md_ssl_tls return the
hash length.
* programs/ssl/ssl_server2.c: multiple conflicts between the introduction
of MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_ASYNC_IN_PROGRESS and new auxiliary functions and
definitions for async support, and the introduction of idle().
* definitions before main: concurrent additions, kept both.
* main, just after `handshake:`: in the loop around
mbedtls_ssl_handshake(), merge the addition of support for
MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_ASYNC_IN_PROGRESS and SSL_ASYNC_INJECT_ERROR_CANCEL
with the addition of the idle() call.
* main, if `opt.transport == MBEDTLS_SSL_TRANSPORT_STREAM`: take the
code from development and add a check for
MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_ASYNC_IN_PROGRESS.
* main, loop around mbedtls_ssl_read() in the datagram case:
take the code from development and add a check for
MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_ASYNC_IN_PROGRESS; revert to a do...while loop.
* main, loop around mbedtls_ssl_write() in the datagram case:
take the code from development and add a check for
MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_ASYNC_IN_PROGRESS; revert to a do...while loop.
The cryptographic API should not be related to whether or not
there is alternative implementation. The API should be same for regular
implementation, and for alternative implementation, so it is defined
outside of the XXX_ALT precompilation check in the cryptographic API header
