Typedef'ed structures are suffixed _t
Also updated the initialiser macro with content that actually
matches the structure's content.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
Since HMAC moved into its own compilation unit, the internal API needed
to be documented and finalized. This means no more reaching deep into
the operation structure from within the PSA Crypto core. This will make
future refactoring work easier, since internal HMAC is now opaque to the
core.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
Modeled after the include chain of the primitive operation contexts.
Also moved the HMAC context structure to the builtin composites file,
since that is where it conceptually belongs. This is a preparatory
step for implementing driver dispatch of MAC multipart operations.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
This was probably included by mistake, because the file itself is part
of the inclusion chain starting with crypto.h.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
This is a preparatory step in order to be able to organize the include
chain from crypto_struct in such a way that the MAC operation structure
for the PSA 'software' driver can make use of the hash operation structure.
Conceptually:
* Primitives:
* Hash
* Cipher
* Composites:
* AEAD (can use cipher)
* MAC (can use cipher and/or hash)
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
This algorithm is used for example by the Thread 1.1.1 specification,
which is not public but can be obtained free of charge at
https://www.threadgroup.org/ThreadSpec
Here it doesn't really make sense to define a parametrised family, as
this really seems to be the only use of PBKDF2 with a CMAC-based PRF (or
with any PRF other than HMAC with SHA1 or SHA2, for that matter).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Might make the implementer's life a bit simpler, and is not a big
constraint on applications.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
No change of behaviour, encoding or naming intended in this commit: just
describe the same behaviour, but in a way that's hopefully clearer and
more complete.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Note on naming: previously considered input_numeric but then thought the
other two input function are "input <name>" not "input <adjective>" so
decided to follow that pattern. input_int would be shorter but sounds
too much like the C type, which could be confusing as that's not the
type of the parameter; IMO "integer" avoids that problem.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
For the numeric values, I followed the apparent existing convention:
- first byte is 01 for secret inputs, 02 for non-secret inputs
- then second by is just incremented for each new input type
The documentation references a function that will be introduced in the
next commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The documentation references functions that will be introduced in later
commits, but hopefully from the naming it's already clear what those
function will do.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Question to reviewers: regarding the numeric values, I'm not sure I've
incremented the right byte/nibble. Should this be 0x1201, 0x1202
instead, or something else? Is there a convention I should be aware of?
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Specifically allow the driver to override the persistency level of a
builtin key in cases where the driver is persistency-aware.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
