In the `not` function, in keep-going mode, arrange to report the
failing command (rather than `"$@"`).
Note that the `!` keyword should not be used, because failures with
`!` are not reported properly.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Remove the obsolete functions record_status and if_build_succeeded.
They didn't affect error detection, but they made error reporting
worse since $BASH_COMMAND would be the unexpanded "$@".
Keep the function definitions for the sake of pull requests using them
that may still be in flight.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Remove ssl-opt.err even if it's empty.
Call cat unconditionally: it'll have no visible effect if the file is
empty.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This commit completely rewrites keep-going mode. Instead of relying
solely on "set -e", which has some subtle limitations (such as being
off anywhere inside a conditional), use an ERR trap to record errors.
Run each component in a subshell. This way a component can set
environment variables, change the current directory, etc., without
affecting other components.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This will let us use bash features that are not found in some other sh
implementations, such as DEBUG and ERR traps, "set -o pipefail", etc.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The power 2 check now uses a looping bit shift to try match
with the block sizes and will escape the loop when appropriate
The test cases, as pointed out by Gilles, could be harmful in
the future and testing a test case is not generally necessary
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Restore the optimization done in
HEAD^{/Speed up the generation of storage format test cases}
which was lost during refactoring made when adding support for
implicit usage flags.
There are still more than one call to the C compiler, but the extra
calls are only for some key usage test cases.
This is an internal refactoring. This commit does not change the
output of generate_psa_tests.py
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
tests/scripts/check_test_cases.py located duplicate descriptions
for the negative tests checking that the check fails when a block
size is not a power of 2
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Add a check to ensure the block_size is or is not a power of 2
Add a new parameter to verify the expected pass/fail when a block_size
is or is not a power of 2.
Add new sets of input data to verify these tests
Fixes#4228
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
- Reword the comment on config.h to suggest that
`MAX_INTERMEDIATE_CA` may not exist in the config.
- Add a comment explaining why the tests are more restrictive
than necessary.
Signed-off-by: Yuto Takano <yuto.takano@arm.com>
- Abstract out repetitive checks for IN and OUT content lens
- Remove unclear comment and redundant echo
- Add content length constraints in Renegotiation with fragment length test
Signed-off-by: Yuto Takano <yuto.takano@arm.com>
- Replace last remaining dependency on config.py with query_config
- Replace hard exit with `requires_config_value_at_least` and
`requires_config_value_at_most` to maintain the same effect
Signed-off-by: Yuto Takano <yuto.takano@arm.com>
- Replace calls to config.py for MAX_IN_LEN and MAX_OUT_LEN with
`get_config_value_or_default`
- Remove hard exit when MAX_IN/OUT_LEN < 4096, replace with
`requires_config_value_at_least`
Signed-off-by: Yuto Takano <yuto.takano@arm.com>
Update maybe_requires_ciphersuite_enabled so that it will not skip the
ciphersuite requirement when running a test case where the test expects
a ciphersuite mismatch
Signed-off-by: Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@arm.com>
Modify tests to test mbedtls_psa_cipher_operation_t,
mbedtls_transparent_test_driver_cipher_operation_t and
mbedtls_opaque_test_driver_cipher_operation_t struct initialization macros.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Tests for psa_cipher_encrypt and psa_cipher_decrypt functions.
The psa_cipher_encrypt function takes no parameter for IV and always generates
it therefore there will be a randomness in the calculation and cannot be
validated by comparing the actual output with the expected output.
The function is tested by:
- doing a prtially randomized test with an encryption then a decryption
and validating the input with output of the decryption
- validating against the multipart encryption
The combination of this two methods provides enough coverage like a
known answer test.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
