Some parts were already implicitly using this as the two ifdefs were nested,
and some others didn't, which resulted in compile errors in some configs. This
fixes those errors and saves a bit of code+RAM that was previously wasted when
ECP_RESTARTABLE was defined but ECDSA_C wasn't
The fact that you needed to pass a pointer to mbedtls_ecdsa_restart_ctx (or
that you needed to know the key type of the PK context) was a breach of
abstraction.
Change the API (and callers) now, and the implementation will be changed in
the next commit.
For RSA, we could either have the function return an error code like
NOT_IMPLEMENTED or just run while disregarding ecp_max_ops. IMO the second
option makes more sense, as otherwise the caller would need to check whether
the key is EC or RSA before deciding to call either sign() or
sign_restartable(), and having to do this kind of check feels contrary to the
goal of the PK layer.
There were preprocessor directives in pk.c and pk_wrap.c that cheked
whether the bit length of size_t was greater than that of unsigned int.
However, the check relied on the MBEDTLS_HAVE_INT64 macro being defined
which is not directly related to size_t. This might result in errors in
some platforms. This change modifies the check to use the macros
SIZE_MAX and UINT_MAX instead making the code more robust.
This patch introduces some additional checks in the PK module for 64-bit
systems only. The problem is that the API functions in the PK
abstraction accept a size_t value for the hashlen, while the RSA module
accepts an unsigned int for the hashlen. Instead of silently casting
size_t to unsigned int, this change checks whether the hashlen overflows
an unsigned int and returns an error.
Just applying rename.pl with this file:
mbedtls_cipher_get_key_size mbedtls_cipher_get_key_bitlen
mbedtls_pk_get_size mbedtls_pk_get_bitlen
MBEDTLS_BLOWFISH_MIN_KEY MBEDTLS_BLOWFISH_MIN_KEY_BITS
MBEDTLS_BLOWFISH_MAX_KEY MBEDTLS_BLOWFISH_MAX_KEY_BITS
- more freedom for us to change it in the future
- enforces hygiene
- performance impact of making accessors no longer inline should really be
negligible
