TCP's snd_nxt represents the next sequence number after sent data, and
as such does not cover any unsent data queued on the connection. The
current implementation does not take the latter point into account
when processing FIN acknowledgments, mistakenly assuming that an
outgoing FIN is ACK'ed when the acknowledgment covers up to snd_nxt
while there is still unsent data. This patch adds a check for unsent
data to correct this, effectively preventing that TCP connections are
closed prematurely.
It is possible that the byte sent as a zero window probe is accepted
and acknowledged by the receiver side without the window being opened.
In that case, the stream has effectively advanced by one byte, and
since lwIP did not take this into account on the sender side, the
result was a desynchronization between the sender and the receiver.
That situation could occur even on a lwIP loopback device, after
filling up the receiver side's receive buffer, and resulted in an ACK
storm. This patch corrects the problem by advancing the sender's next
sequence number by one as needed when sending a zero window probe.
delay_time and stale_time are ticks now.
reachable_time and invalidation_timer are untouched since they may originate from telegram values -> not converting them to ticks avoids an integer division
commit 8c52afb6ca21 ("igmp: Optimize code by always skipping the first entry in the linked groups list - it is always the "allsystems" entry")
accidently changes the code logic. it should check groupref rather than group.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Reasoning:
- Makes code in single-netif case perform better and smaller
- IGMP / MLD6 code is a little bit easier to read and understand
- Easier to get multicast groups per netif when implementing drivers
Downside: In multi-netif mode, there are two more pointers on each netif, even if IGMP/MLD6 is not used on it. But these systems should not be so memory-constrained that this will matter.
In a dual stack configuration it is not really feasible to wait
until the IPv4 address is valid before starting the mDNS responder.
If there is no DHCPv4 server in the network, the IPv4 address may
never become valid, which should however not preclude IPv6 mDNS
from working.
