mirror of
https://github.com/lwip-tcpip/lwip.git
synced 2024-12-25 18:14:53 +00:00
socket tcp performance tweak: handle window update (call into tcpipi_thread) only once per recv for multi-segment receives
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0bc2fa968
commit
b71d4477ea
@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ lwip_listen(int s, int backlog)
|
|||||||
static int
|
static int
|
||||||
lwip_recv_tcp(struct lwip_sock *sock, void *mem, size_t len, int flags)
|
lwip_recv_tcp(struct lwip_sock *sock, void *mem, size_t len, int flags)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
u8_t apiflags;
|
u8_t apiflags = NETCONN_NOAUTORCVD;
|
||||||
int recvd = 0;
|
int recvd = 0;
|
||||||
int recv_left = len;
|
int recv_left = len;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -873,8 +873,7 @@ lwip_recv_tcp(struct lwip_sock *sock, void *mem, size_t len, int flags)
|
|||||||
sock->conn->callback(sock->conn, NETCONN_EVT_RCVPLUS, 0);
|
sock->conn->callback(sock->conn, NETCONN_EVT_RCVPLUS, 0);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
sock_set_errno(sock, 0);
|
goto lwip_recv_tcp_done;
|
||||||
return recvd;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* We should really do some error checking here. */
|
/* We should really do some error checking here. */
|
||||||
LWIP_DEBUGF(SOCKETS_DEBUG, ("lwip_recv_tcp: p == NULL, error is \"%s\"!\n",
|
LWIP_DEBUGF(SOCKETS_DEBUG, ("lwip_recv_tcp: p == NULL, error is \"%s\"!\n",
|
||||||
@ -928,6 +927,12 @@ lwip_recv_tcp(struct lwip_sock *sock, void *mem, size_t len, int flags)
|
|||||||
apiflags |= NETCONN_DONTBLOCK;
|
apiflags |= NETCONN_DONTBLOCK;
|
||||||
/* @todo: do we need to support peeking more than one pbuf? */
|
/* @todo: do we need to support peeking more than one pbuf? */
|
||||||
} while ((recv_left > 0) || (flags & MSG_PEEK));
|
} while ((recv_left > 0) || (flags & MSG_PEEK));
|
||||||
|
lwip_recv_tcp_done:
|
||||||
|
if (recvd > 0) {
|
||||||
|
/* ensure window update after copying all data */
|
||||||
|
netconn_tcp_recvd(sock->conn, recvd);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
sock_set_errno(sock, 0);
|
||||||
return recvd;
|
return recvd;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user