From dfad5f1d3978c51a2a1f26c59ea8da1ace5b1544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:12:44 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.rst

---
 README.rst | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 7c5c86c4..d06b11e0 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -265,15 +265,15 @@ equivalent is filled 2000000 times with output sent to ``/dev/null``; for
 further details see the `source
 <https://github.com/cppformat/format-benchmark/blob/master/tinyformat_test.cpp>`_.
 
-============== ========
-test name      run time
-============== ========
-libc printf     1.30s
-std::ostream    1.85s
-cppformat       1.42s
-tinyformat      2.25s
-boost::format   9.94s
-============== ========
+==============    ============ ===========
+Library           Method       Run Time, s
+==============    ============ ===========
+EGLIBC 2.19       printf          1.30
+std::ostream      operator<<      1.85
+C++ Format 1.0    fmt::print      1.42
+tinyformat 2.0.1  tfm::printf     2.25
+Boost Format 1.54 boost::format   9.94
+================= ============= ==========
 
 As you can see boost::format is much slower than the alternative methods; this
 is confirmed by `other tests <http://accu.org/index.php/journals/1539>`_.