From 50151ff80464b81af349418596fccc8b61ee404f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:37:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.rst

---
 README.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 302215d0..d3d6ef3b 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ As you can see boost::format is much slower than the alternative methods; this
 is confirmed by `other tests <http://accu.org/index.php/journals/1539>`_.
 Tinyformat is quite good coming close to IOStreams.  Unfortunately tinyformat
 cannot be faster than the IOStreams because it uses them internally.
-Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf. cppformat is `faster on integer
+Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf, being `faster than printf on integer
 formatting <http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html>`_,
 but slower on floating-point formatting which dominates this benchmark.